Fleet Storage Threat Detection Using Local and Cloud ML Stages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing storage systems face challenges in efficiently managing and securing large fleets of storage systems, particularly in detecting and mitigating multi-dimensional threats across distributed networks.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a cloud-based monitoring system with a fleet-level analysis module using machine learning models to analyze threat probability scores and payload data from multiple storage systems, enabling comprehensive threat detection and management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring systems are used for storage fleets, then individual system monitoring is possible, but comprehensive fleet-wide threat detection and multi-dimensional analysis is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is divided into multiple independent modules: data collection module, threat detection module, analysis module, and response module. Each module handles specific aspects of monitoring, allowing comprehensive fleet-wide threat detection while maintaining modular architecture that manages complexity through functional separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-dimensional monitoring to multi-dimensional analysis by incorporating threat probability scores, payload data analysis, behavioral patterns, and contextual information. This dimensional expansion enables comprehensive security assessment across the entire storage fleet without overwhelming complexity in any single monitoring component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If detailed threat analysis is performed on all storage systems, then detection precision is improved, but processing time and system response speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection precisionVSAvoidthreat detection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously collecting and pre-processing data from storage systems, maintaining baseline behavioral patterns and threat probability scores. This allows the analysis module to make rapid assessments without performing exhaustive analysis from scratch, thus maintaining both precision and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial analysis by focusing computational resources on the most critical indicators and high-probability threats rather than uniformly analyzing all data points. This selective approach maintains detection precision for critical issues while reducing overall processing time through targeted analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If real-time monitoring of all storage systems is implemented, then threat detection capability is improved, but data volume and information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoring capabilityVSAvoidinformation processing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant information from the vast amount of data collected from storage systems. By filtering and selecting critical parameters such as threat probability scores, anomaly indicators, and high-value payload data, the system reduces information processing overhead while maintaining comprehensive security monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where threat detection results and analysis outcomes are fed back into the monitoring process. This allows continuous refinement of monitoring parameters and prioritization of high-value information, reducing the effective information processing load by focusing on the most relevant data streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260057085A1Multi-Stage, High-Dimensional Threat Detection for a Fleet of Storage Systems
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 PURE STORAGE INC
  • US20260057085A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057085A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057085A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a fleet of storage systems and a cloud-based monitoring system configured to monitor for security threats against the fleet. A first storage system in the fleet is configured to use a first local ML model trained on confirmed threat patterns to perform a first analysis of a first plurality of attributes associated with operations performed with respect to the first storage system during a first short-time window and determine, based on the first analysis, a first threat probability score. If the score meets a threshold, the first storage system sends the score and payload data to the cloud-based monitoring system, which performs, based on the received data, a fleet-level cloud-based analysis to determine a likelihood that the fleet of storage systems is being targeted by the security threat.