Fleet Trajectory Planning Across MUTEX Zones With Subproblem Decomposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The coordination of multiple vehicles in confined areas with mutually exclusive zones (MUTEX) is computationally complex and inefficient, particularly due to the NP-hard nature of combinatorial decisions, leading to significant computational effort in realistic scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A method that decomposes the vehicle trajectory planning problem into smaller, independent subproblems by identifying and removing irrelevant MUTEX zone constraints using dual variables, allowing for parallel computation of trajectory plans for vehicle subsets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If optimal control methods are used to compute coordinated vehicle trajectories, then safety constraints are satisfied, but computational complexity scales cubically with the number of vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety constraint satisfactionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the fleet of vehicles into multiple subsets based on spatial regions and MUTEX zone relationships. Each subset is optimized independently through separate NLP problems, transforming one large cubic-complexity problem into multiple smaller problems with reduced individual complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a spatial dimension to the optimization problem by defining regions and using spatial relationships to determine subset assignments. This transforms the problem from a purely combinatorial vehicle-pair analysis to a spatially-structured optimization that reduces computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If the NLP is solved for all vehicles jointly over long horizons, then optimal coordinated trajectories are obtained, but the NLP becomes the predominant component in computational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory optimization qualityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fleet into multiple subsets that are optimized independently. This segmentation maintains optimization quality within each subset while dramatically reducing the computational time required compared to solving one large joint NLP for all vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary classification of vehicles into subsets based on spatial regions and MUTEX relationships before solving the NLP problems. This preliminary action enables the decomposition of the optimization problem, reducing computational time while preserving trajectory quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the coordination problem is decomposed into smaller subproblems, then computational efficiency is improved, but the solution space may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidsolution optimality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the problem based on spatial regions and MUTEX zone relationships, ensuring that vehicles in different regions with no mutual exclusivity constraints are optimized independently. This segmentation maintains solution optimality while improving computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback from the classification stage to guide the NLP optimization process. The subset assignments are determined based on MUTEX relationships and spatial positions, providing feedback that ensures optimal solutions are found within each subset while maintaining overall fleet coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12530966B2Efficient trajectory planning for a fleet of vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 VOLVO AUTONOMOUS SOLUTIONS AB
  • US12530966B2 patent drawing
  • US12530966B2 patent drawing
  • US12530966B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of planning trajectories for vehicles operating in a common environment, wherein movements of each vehicle are controllable by a control signal is provided the method includes for each vehicle, obtaining a predefined vehicle path to be traversed; performing a first computation to obtain a vehicle crossing order at each mutually exclusive—MUTEX—zone between two vehicle paths, wherein the first computation is subject to safety constraints; and performing trajectory planning subject to the obtained vehicle crossing order at the MUTEX zones, to obtain a control signal for each of the vehicles. The method further includes assigning a dependency metric to each pair of vehicles, and partitioning the vehicles into a number NSG of vehicle subsets such that the dependency metric exceeds a threshold within each, wherein the trajectory planning is performed as multiple independent subproblems, each relating to one of the vehicle subsets.