Flexible Bag Convertible Bottom Reinforcement Panel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current bag manufacturing processes face limitations in production rate and waste management, especially when producing square-bottomed bags with bellows, due to the need for precise adjustments and generation of waste during the manufacturing of bags with bellows, which affects efficiency and quality.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a system with reinforcement panels between the bellows of flexible bags made from materials like paper or synthetic materials, which provides additional stiffness and allows for the formation of a square bottom without generating waste, by using a continuous process that folds and bonds the flaps without cutting the edges, and a machine that can easily adjust to different widths and formats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a continuous process with cutting and folding is used to manufacture bags with bellows, then production rate is improved, but waste is generated and machine adjustment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoidwaste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates waste generation by avoiding the cutting step entirely. The continuous process folds the flexible material to form bellows and seals them through bonding, recovering all material used in the process. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high production rate through continuous processing while eliminating waste through a cut-free design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Manufacturing precision

If cutting is used to create sharp edges on bags, then edge quality is improved, but waste is generated during lateral seam manufacturing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge qualityVSAvoidwaste
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the cutting operation from the manufacturing process entirely. Instead of cutting edges to achieve sharp appearance, the process uses folding and bonding of lateral seams to create the desired edge quality without material removal. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining manufacturing precision through alternative means that do not generate waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If perforation means are changed and adjusted for different bag widths, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but adjustment time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebag format precisionVSAvoidmachine adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the folding and bonding mechanism universal by designing it to accommodate different bag widths and formats without requiring changes to the fundamental process or components. The continuous processing line can be adjusted through simple parameter changes rather than physical component changes, resolving the contradiction by maintaining manufacturing precision while dramatically reducing adjustment complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of substance

If flaps are bonded along edges without cutting, then waste is eliminated, but the useful width of the bag is reduced by the bonded areas

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovewasteVSAvoiduseful bag width
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses thin bonding areas along the lateral edges that minimally impact the useful width of the bag. The bonding is applied only to the necessary edge portions to create secure seals, leaving the majority of the bag width available for use. This resolves the contradiction by eliminating waste through edge bonding while preserving maximum useful area through optimized bonding placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables high-rate production of square-bottomed bags with improved resistance and functionality, reduced waste, and easier adjustment for different formats, while maintaining a sharp edge quality and visual appearance.

Implementation Method 1

adhesive is applied to the hems at least over one length of the first or second flap on one seam face... the folding means being configured to bring each edge hem against hem by the seam face so as to obtain bonding of the hems to each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS20240239558A1Flexible bag having a convertible bottom, method and machine for manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2024.07.18 HOLWEG GRP
  • US20240239558A1 patent drawing
  • US20240239558A1 patent drawing
  • US20240239558A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A bag made of flexible material has a first and a second segment having cheeks along their selvages, the cheeks being joined together so as to form two gussets joining the segments together, one end of the bag perpendicular to the selvages being closed. The bag has a system of at least one reinforcing panel extending over a central part of the segments, between the gussets, each segment having a fold marking line, one opposite the other, in order to delimit a bottom at the closed end. Method and machine for manufacturing such a bag.