Flexible Barrier Safety Gate for Forklift Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mezzanine structures in industrial settings often lack effective and cost-efficient fall protection, leading to accidents, and existing solutions such as cord connections or expensive gate systems are inefficient or impractical.

Innovation Solution

A flexible barrier safety gate that moves apart to accommodate forklift forks, featuring pairs of moveable guidance rails and a support assembly with elastic compression means, allowing safe passage while automatically returning to a closed position to meet safety regulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional rigid gate systems are used to prevent falls, then safety is improved, but the gate cannot accommodate forklift access and requires more space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall protectionVSAvoidforklift access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The gate system transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic flexible system. The guidance rails are designed to be movable rather than fixed, allowing them to flex outward when force is applied by forklift forks. This dynamic behavior enables the gate to adapt between its safety function (closed position) and access function (open position during forklift entry/exit).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The gate employs flexible guidance rails that can bend and flex outward to accommodate forklift forks. These rails are constructed with sufficient flexibility to deform under the force of the forks while maintaining structural integrity, allowing the gate to temporarily change its configuration from a closed barrier to an open passage without compromising overall safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Adaptability or versatility

If swing gates or roll-around gates are used, then forklift access is enabled, but the device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforklift accessVSAvoidgate mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate is divided into multiple independent guidance rails that can move separately rather than as a single rigid unit. Each rail is independently supported by springs and can flex outward individually when contacted by forklift forks. This segmentation simplifies the overall mechanism compared to complex swing or roll-around gate systems, as each component performs a single function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gate system is self-actuating through spring mechanisms that automatically return the guidance rails to their closed position after forklift passage. The springs store potential energy when the rails are pushed outward by the forks and automatically release this energy to restore the barrier, eliminating the need for motors, operators, or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If electric hand rail systems are used, then automated safety control is achieved, but the cost and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety controlVSAvoidoperator requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical spring system provides automatic safety control without requiring electrical components or human operators. When forklift forks push the guidance rails outward, the springs are compressed or extended, storing energy. Once the forks pass through, the springs automatically return the rails to their closed safety position, providing continuous passive safety control throughout the gate's operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces complex electrical control systems with a purely mechanical spring-based mechanism. Instead of using motors, sensors, and control circuits to manage gate opening and closing, the system uses mechanical springs to provide the necessary force for both opening (when pushed by forks) and closing (automatic return), simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If cord connection fall protection is used, then fall prevention is achieved, but the operational time and effort increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall preventionVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate provides continuous passive fall protection that requires no active participation from workers. Unlike cord systems that must be manually connected and disconnected at each position, this gate maintains a constant physical barrier that automatically protects workers throughout their entire movement on the mezzanine, eliminating the time-consuming connection/disconnection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The safety barrier is pre-positioned and continuously maintained in the closed protective position before any worker movement occurs. The gate is already in place and requires no preparation or activation by workers, providing immediate and continuous fall protection as they move across the mezzanine, rather than requiring them to stop and connect safety equipment at each location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a cost-effective, safe, and efficient fall protection system that allows forklifts to access mezzanine levels without compromising safety, meeting OSHA standards and reducing operational time.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic compression means operably positioned between each guidance rail and each corresponding upright support member for providing a resistive counter force to the application of the opening force produced by the forks through their respective vertical paths of motion and biasing the guidance members in their respective default, closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9938736B2Barrier safety gate
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 DIVERSE HLDG
  • US9938736B2 patent drawing
  • US9938736B2 patent drawing
  • US9938736B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A barrier safety gate is provided which flexes and moves apart in order to receive the vertical path of motion of forks of a fork lift for loading and unloading from a raised platform. The barrier safety gate includes a first and a second pair of opening, flexible guidance members having a default, closed position and an opening, flexible path of motion. In particular, each pair of guidance members are laterally aligned to flex apart to receive the width of each respective fork of the fork lift which provides an opening force through their vertical paths of motion.