Flexible U-Shaped Bicycle Stabilizer for Varying Wheel Sizes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bicycle stabilizers fail to securely lock the front wheel assembly in place, particularly on varying wheel diameters and tire sizes, leading to potential tipping and damage, and often require manual disengagement, which can cause accidents or damage when riding.

Innovation Solution

A swinging, variably adjustable bicycle stabilizer with a flexible u-shaped fork that grips the tire sidewalls, automatically releases when the bike is pushed forward, and is designed to accommodate different wheel sizes and bicycle frame diameters, featuring a flexible anchor base and LED lighting for secure attachment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed rigid stabilizer is used, then the structure is simple and strong, but it cannot accommodate varying wheel sizes and tire thicknesses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of varying wheel sizesVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer employs a flexible u-shaped fork that can dynamically adjust its shape to accommodate different wheel sizes and tire thicknesses. The fork's flexibility allows it to bend and conform to the contours of various tire profiles, providing secure engagement without requiring multiple sizes or complex adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilizer design incorporates variable geometric parameters through its flexible construction. The u-shaped fork can change its effective dimensions and curvature based on the wheel size it engages, allowing a single device to adapt to multiple wheel diameters and tire thicknesses without compromising structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If compression is applied directly to the base of the tire at a single point, then the stabilizer structure is simple, but it causes high stress concentration and potential tire damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress distribution on tireVSAvoidstabilizer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer divides the compression force application into multiple contact points along the u-shaped fork rather than concentrating it at a single point. The fork's curved structure naturally distributes the stabilizing force across different portions of the tire, reducing stress concentration and minimizing the risk of tire damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The u-shaped fork is constructed as a flexible element that can deform to match the tire's surface contour. This flexibility allows the stabilizer to apply gentle, distributed pressure across the tire's curvature rather than rigid, concentrated force, thereby protecting the tire from damage while maintaining stabilization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Reliability

If manual disengagement mechanism is used, then the stabilizer can be securely locked, but it requires user intervention that may lead to accidents or damage when riding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure lockingVSAvoidautomatic release operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer is designed with an automatic release mechanism that detects when the bicycle is in motion and autonomously disengages from the wheel. This self-service feature eliminates the need for manual intervention, ensuring the stabilizer is properly disengaged before riding without requiring user awareness or action, thereby preventing accidents caused by forgotten engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilizer incorporates a feedback mechanism that responds to the bicycle's motion state. When the bicycle begins to move, the mechanism detects this change and automatically triggers the release sequence, ensuring the stabilizer disengages at the appropriate moment. This feedback-based control provides reliable operation without requiring user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Force

If the stabilizer is made heavier to provide more stabilizing force, then the stabilization effect is improved, but the bicycle's overall weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilizing forceVSAvoidbicycle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer achieves adequate stabilizing force through optimized geometric parameters and material selection rather than increased mass. The flexible u-shaped fork is designed with appropriate thickness and curvature to generate sufficient stabilizing moment while maintaining minimal weight, allowing effective stabilization without significantly increasing the bicycle's overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents bicycle tipping by locking the front wheel assembly in line with the rear wheel axis, accommodates various wheel sizes and frame shapes, ensures easy and tool-free installation, and minimizes weight while providing secure and automatic operation.

Implementation Method 1

a pivoting, wheel stabilizer (6) being pivotally-connected by a spring-loaded axle (4)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a flexible u-shaped fork that grips the tire sidewalls

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11312437B2Adjustable system for stabilizing a bicycle
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 RIZZI JOHN JOSEPH
  • US11312437B2 patent drawing
  • US11312437B2 patent drawing
  • US11312437B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A light weight, automatic release, variably adjustable bicycle stabilizer is disclosed. The invention is comprised of five main parts: a first part being an adjustable, pivoting, slightly flexible u-shaped fork that stabilizes the wheel; a second part being an anchor bracket; a third part being a down tube stabilizer; a fourth part being a compression band; and a fifth part being an onboard, LED, safety light. The invention is selectively affixed to the underside of a bicycle frame. The anchor is disposed on the down tube and the slightly flexible u-shaped fork wheel stabilizer swings out from said anchor and grabs the front wheel preventing the wheel from turning and tipping the bike over. The end of each fork is wider on the inside. This stops the bicycle from rolling backward when parked on an incline.