Flexible Cabin Isolation Device for Aerosol Containment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bio-aerosol exposure infection equipment faces challenges in effectively reducing aerosol leakage risks due to its large size and weight, which complicates biosafety protection and isolation operations, and limits flexibility in site selection.

Innovation Solution

The isolation device features a flexible cabin body with a rigid frame, a protective half suit with HEPA filtration, and a working table with integrated air management systems, including air inlet and exhaust filters, to create a negative pressure environment for safe operation and personnel protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a large-sized isolation device is used to contain bio-aerosol exposure equipment, then aerosol leakage prevention is improved, but the device size and weight increase, making it difficult to adapt to different installation sites

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerosol leakage preventionVSAvoidisolation device size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The isolation device is divided into a fixed support frame and a flexible cabin body that can be independently assembled and disassembled. The cabin body includes separate functional modules (work area, storage area, control area) that can be configured according to different installation sites, reducing the need for a single large rigid structure while maintaining effective aerosol containment through the sealed flexible enclosure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If a large sealing door is arranged at the bottom of the isolation device for equipment access, then operational accessibility is improved, but the device complexity and sealing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment accessVSAvoidsealing door structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The isolation device uses a flexible cabin body with zippered or roll-up access points instead of large fixed sealing doors. These dynamic access points can be opened only when needed and maintain sealing when closed, eliminating the need for complex large door mechanisms while preserving equipment access capability through the flexible enclosure walls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If various operation interfaces are provided on the isolation device for test operations, then operational flexibility is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation interface flexibilityVSAvoidinterface structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The isolation device incorporates a universal control system with a touchscreen display and standardized control interfaces that can manage multiple functions (aerosol generation, animal monitoring, environmental control, data collection) through a single integrated panel. This multi-functional interface reduces the need for separate specialized controls for each operation, maintaining versatility while simplifying the overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for flexible assembly and disassembly, easy transportation, and effective aerosol containment, ensuring operator safety and preventing environmental pollution by enabling flexible operation in various environments and improving motion range during bio-aerosol exposure tests.

Implementation Method 1

The HEPA filter is mounted in the filter box body, and is configured for efficiently filtering environment air to be delivered into the protective half suit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

the air supply filter device is communicated with an interior of the protective half suit through an air pipe, and inflates the protective half suit by air with a positive pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPositive pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

The air inlet device and an air exhaust device, arranged on a side wall of the cabin body... create a negative pressure environment for safe operation and personnel protection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure: Depressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS20230366569A1Isolation device for insolating aerosol exposure
Publication Date: 2023.11.16 MEDICAL SUPPORT TECH RES DEPT SYST ENG INST ACAD OF MILITARY SCI
  • US20230366569A1 patent drawing
  • US20230366569A1 patent drawing
  • US20230366569A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure discloses an isolation device for insolating aerosol exposure, which may be used as an isolation device for a test with a biological aerosol exposure infection risk. The isolation device for insolating aerosol exposure of the present disclosure includes a cabin body; protective half suit arranged in the cabin body; a working table arranged at an accessible horizontal position of the protective half suit in the cabin body; and an air inlet device and an air exhaust device arranged on a side wall of the cabin body. By using the support structure of the cabin body and the rigid frame, flexible assembling and disassembling of the isolation device and easiness in transportation are realized; and based on design mechanisms of negative pressure control, airtight isolation and high-level personnel protection, physical isolation of high-risk operations is realized, operation personnel is effectively protected, and environmental pollution is prevented.