Flexible Data Store for Streamlined Acquisition Process

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large organizations face complexities in managing integrated acquisition processes, including defining requirements, evaluating proposals, and awarding contracts, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors due to the lack of standardized formats and efficient communication between buyers and vendors.

Innovation Solution

A flexible data structure and online acquisition management tool that standardizes the format of proposals, facilitates a granular requirement-by-requirement evaluation, and provides an error checking report, enabling buyers to compare proposals effectively and vendors to refine their offerings, while also storing acquisition process information for audit purposes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a standardized data structure is implemented to connect buyer requirements to vendor proposals, then proposal evaluation efficiency and accuracy are improved, but the complexity of the acquisition management system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproposal evaluation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the acquisition process into discrete, standardized data elements that can be independently defined, evaluated, and tracked. Each requirement and proposal element is broken down into structured components that can be systematically compared, reducing the cognitive load on evaluators while maintaining system integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal data structure that serves multiple functions: defining requirements, evaluating proposals, tracking compliance, and generating reports. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a single integrated platform, managing complexity through consolidation rather than proliferation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If manual proposal evaluation processes are used without standardized formats, then system implementation is simpler, but evaluation accuracy and comparability between vendors decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproposal evaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms unstructured proposal data into structured parameters that can be precisely measured and compared. By defining specific evaluation criteria and data elements, the system enables quantitative assessment of qualitative proposals, significantly improving measurement precision while providing a clear framework that guides the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a standardized data structure as an intermediary layer between raw vendor proposals and buyer evaluation. This intermediary transforms diverse vendor inputs into a common format, enabling accurate comparison without requiring buyers to manually interpret unstructured data from multiple vendors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If granular requirement-by-requirement evaluation is implemented, then value determination accuracy improves, but the time required for the acquisition process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalue determination accuracyVSAvoidacquisition process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary structuring and organization of requirements and proposals into standardized data elements before the actual evaluation begins. This pre-processing work, including defining evaluation criteria and organizing data structures, enables rapid granular comparison during the evaluation phase, reducing the time penalty that would otherwise result from detailed requirement-by-requirement analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous evaluation capability through its structured data approach, allowing evaluators to systematically progress through requirements without interruption or rework. The standardized format enables seamless movement from one requirement to the next, keeping the evaluation process in continuous motion rather than requiring repeated setup and analysis for each requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Reliability

If multiple versions of requirements and proposals are stored for audit purposes, then compliance and traceability are improved, but data storage and management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudit complianceVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested version control structure where multiple versions of requirements and proposals are stored within a hierarchical framework. Each version is nested within the overall acquisition record, maintaining full traceability while organizing data in a compact, manageable structure that avoids the complexity of separate storage systems for each version.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS8700488B2Flexible data store for implementing a streamlined acquisition process
Publication Date: 2014.04.15 NOBLIS INC
  • US8700488B2 patent drawing
  • US8700488B2 patent drawing
  • US8700488B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for seamlessly integrating an end-to-end acquisition process using a flexible data structure are disclosed. A flexible data structure consistent with these methods and systems may connect the buyer's requirement to the vendor's proposed solution, facilitating a requirement-by-requirement evaluation process allowing buyers to evaluate content as well as price of a proposal. Embodiments of the present invention standardize the format of proposals, allowing buyers to more easily compare vendors' proposals side-by-side. Still other embodiments of the present invention produce an error checking report to further aid vendors in improving proposals and buyers in evaluating proposals.