Flexible Display Hinge With Moving Spine Covers for Bend Radius Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flexible displays in foldable devices are prone to damage due to sharp bending at the spine, leading to reliability issues and a non-uniform tactile experience during rotation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a hinge mechanism with orientation-dependent translation and pivoting spine covers that move display supports away from the spine in closed orientations to allow for a larger bend radius and move them towards the display in open orientations for support, reducing stress and providing a uniform tactile experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the flexible display is allowed to bend sharply at the spine in closed orientation, then the device can be compact when closed, but the flexible display is prone to damage from sharp bending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compactnessVSAvoidflexible display durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The display support dynamically changes its position relative to the flexible display based on device orientation. In closed orientation, the support moves away to allow sharp bending and compact form factor. In open orientation, the support moves toward the display to provide structural support and prevent damage. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between compactness and durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device is segmented into movable portions (first and second portions) that can rotate relative to each other at the spine. This segmentation allows the device to transition between closed and open orientations, enabling the display support to assume different positions that accommodate both compact storage and protective support functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If display supports are positioned close to the flexible display in closed orientation, then the flexible display is supported and protected, but the bend radius is reduced increasing stress on the display

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexible display supportVSAvoidflexible display stress resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The display support's distance from the flexible display is dynamically adjusted based on device orientation. When closed, the support recedes to increase bend radius and reduce stress. When open, the support advances to provide structural strength. This dynamic positioning resolves the contradiction between support strength and stress resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the first and second portions translate relative to the spine during rotation, then stress forces on the flexible display are reduced, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexible display stress reductionVSAvoidspine assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The translation function is merged with the rotational hinge mechanism. The spine assembly simultaneously performs both rotation and translation movements, eliminating the need for separate translation mechanisms. This integration reduces device complexity while achieving stress reduction through orientation-dependent positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11917780B2Hinged device with a flexible display
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11917780B2 patent drawing
  • US11917780B2 patent drawing
  • US11917780B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The description relates to hinged devices. One example relates to a device that has a first portion hingedly secured along a spine and a second portion hingedly secured along the spine. The example can also include a first spine cover secured relative to the spine and extending into the first portion and a second spine cover secured relative to the spine and extending into the second portion. An extent to which the first spine cover extends into the first portion and the second spine cover extends into the second portion is controlled by an angular orientation of the first and second portions.