Flexible Embolization Scaffold for Aneurysm Conformity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing embolization devices for aneurysms are often rigid, making them difficult to deliver to aneurysms with complex anatomy, require custom microcatheters, and pose a higher risk of rupture, especially in broad-based or ruptured aneurysms.

Innovation Solution

A low-profile, flexible embolization scaffold device with integrated embolization coils that can conform to various aneurysm shapes, allowing for single-step obliteration and minimizing transmural wall pressure, and can be re-sheathed or re-deployed if initially misplaced, without the need for dual-antiplatelet therapy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid embolization devices are used, then structural strength is improved, but deliverability to complex aneurysms and compliance with vessel anatomy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidcompliance with vessel anatomy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The embolization device incorporates a dynamic structure that transitions from a compressed delivery configuration to an expanded functional configuration. The device includes a delivery catheter that maintains the device in a low-profile compressed state for navigation, then allows expansion at the target site to provide structural support and embolization functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The embolization device is nested within a delivery catheter during delivery, allowing the device to be compressed into a small profile for navigation through complex vasculature. Once positioned at the aneurysm site, the device is deployed from the catheter and expanded to its functional configuration, providing both deliverability and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of operation

If custom or large-bore microcatheters are used to deliver rigid devices, then device delivery is achieved, but procedural complexity and patient risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice deliveryVSAvoidcustom catheter requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is designed to be delivered through a universal delivery catheter system that does not require custom or large-bore microcatheters. The device's compressed configuration allows it to navigate through standard catheter sizes, reducing procedural complexity and eliminating the need for specialized catheter fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If rigid embolization devices are deployed in ruptured aneurysms, then embolization can be achieved, but risk of aneurysm rupture increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveembolization effectivenessVSAvoidtransmural wall pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device is designed to minimize transmural wall pressure during deployment by expanding gradually and conforming to the aneurysm geometry. The compliant structure distributes pressure evenly across the aneurysm wall, preventing focal stress concentrations that could trigger rupture in compromised aneurysms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The embolization device incorporates flexible, compliant materials that allow the structure to conform to the aneurysm wall and distribute mechanical stress evenly. This flexibility reduces the risk of causing wall rupture during deployment while maintaining embolization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Productivity

If integrated embolization coils are used with scaffold, then single-step treatment is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficiencyVSAvoidintegrated coil structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device merges the scaffold structure with integrated embolization coils into a single unified device. The coils are incorporated into the scaffold framework, allowing simultaneous deployment of both the supportive scaffold and the embolizing coils in a single step, improving treatment efficiency while managing complexity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11103253B2Embolization scaffold devices
Publication Date: 2021.08.31 MAI JEFFREY C
  • US11103253B2 patent drawing
  • US11103253B2 patent drawing
  • US11103253B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embolization scaffold device. The scaffold has a base having a central longitudinal axis extending therethrough and a plurality of expandable struts extending from the base. Each of the struts has a proximal portion extending from the base and substantially aligned with the central longitudinal axis, an intermediate arcuate portion radially extending away from the central longitudinal axis, and a distal portion curving back towards the central longitudinal axis.