Flexible Flap Device for Mechanical Viral Load Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for combating viral infections, such as vaccines and antiviral drugs, face challenges in effectively reducing or eliminating viral load without causing toxic effects to host cells, and are limited by the complexity of viral replication mechanisms and the sheer number of viruses.

Innovation Solution

A device with a physical structure that includes flexible flaps with angled grooves is implanted in a subject's body or used in an apparatus to trap and crush viruses as blood flows through, utilizing the grooves' expanding and contracting mechanism to scoop and render viruses inert.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vaccines and antiviral drugs are used to combat viral infections, then viral load reduction is achieved, but toxic effects on host cells occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviral load reductionVSAvoidtoxic effects on host cells
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical/biological antiviral mechanisms with a mechanical physical system. The device uses grooves and flaps to mechanically trap and crush viruses in blood flow, eliminating the need for chemical interactions that cause toxicity. This mechanical approach selectively targets viruses based on their physical dimensions without affecting host cells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The device creates localized viral destruction zones through strategically positioned grooves and flaps within the blood flow path. The mechanical crushing action is concentrated at specific locations where viruses are trapped in grooves, while the rest of the bloodstream and host cells remain unaffected by this intense local mechanical action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If traditional antiviral methods are used, then some viral infections are treated, but they cannot effectively eliminate all viruses due to complexity of viral replication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviral infection treatmentVSAvoidviral replication mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device extracts viruses from the bloodstream through physical trapping in grooves, removing them before they can complete replication cycles. By mechanically capturing viruses in transit, the device prevents viral replication without needing to interfere with complex viral replication mechanisms or host cell processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The device segments the blood flow path into zones with different flap configurations and groove orientations, creating multiple interception opportunities for viruses. This segmented approach increases the probability of capturing diverse virus types with different sizes and shapes, overcoming the limitations of single-mechanism antiviral treatments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-affected harmful factors

If mechanical viral crushing is implemented, then viral load is reduced without toxicity, but device structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoxic side effectsVSAvoidphysical structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device employs dynamic flaps that move with blood flow rather than static structures. The flaps flex and adjust their position based on flow conditions, allowing the grooves to open and close at optimal moments to trap viruses. This dynamic behavior reduces the need for complex control mechanisms while maintaining effective viral capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device utilizes the kinetic energy and flow characteristics of blood itself to drive the viral trapping mechanism. Blood flow naturally opens the grooves and activates the flaps, eliminating the need for external power sources or complex control systems. The system serves itself using the energy already present in the bloodstream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach mechanically reduces viral load by physically trapping and crushing viruses, avoiding the toxic side effects associated with traditional treatments and addressing the limitations of existing methods for viral infection control.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one flap is flexible... the at least one flap includes at least one groove disposed in a surface thereof... the grooves' expanding and contracting mechanism to scoop and render viruses inert

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8556085B2Anti-viral device
Publication Date: 2013.10.15 BOGLE STUART
  • US8556085B2 patent drawing
  • US8556085B2 patent drawing
  • US8556085B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An anti-viral device including a body having at least one side wall defining an interior space therein. The body has opposite first and second open ends, the open ends also defined by the at least one side wall and in fluid communication with the interior space. The device further includes at least one flap operatively connected to the at least one side wall and extending into the interior space from the at least one sidewall toward the longitudinal axis of the body, the at least one flap being flexible. And, the device also includes at least one groove disposed in a surface of the at least one flap.