Flexible Interior Partition Wall with Elastic Tensioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lightweight partition walls face difficulties in reducing dimensions for storage and transport due to rigid layers, and securing outer fabrics to frames is challenging, leading to weight and size issues, as well as tension maintenance problems.

Innovation Solution

A wall system featuring a rigid frame with opposing faces made of flexible, elastic material, including stretch fabric or Jacquard fabric, secured with constraining means like enlarged edges or polymeric swellings to maintain tension and allow for easy assembly and disassembly, while maintaining rigidity and aesthetic versatility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid layers are used in the wall structure, then structural strength is improved, but the wall cannot be bent to reduce dimensions for storage and transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidstorage dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The wall is divided into modular panels that can be assembled and disassembled. Each panel contains a rigid frame structure that provides strength, while the overall wall system can be broken down into manageable units for compact storage and transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses flexible fabric coverings over the rigid frame structure. These flexible faces allow the wall to be wrapped and compressed when disassembled, enabling reduction of storage dimensions while the rigid frame maintains structural integrity during use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Strength

If rigid layers are used in the wall structure, then structural strength is improved, but weight increases making transport and assembly difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidwall weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces heavy rigid layers with flexible fabric coverings that are stretched over a lightweight rigid frame. This combination provides the necessary structural strength while significantly reducing the overall weight compared to traditional rigid panel constructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The wall uses a composite structure combining a rigid frame (providing structural strength) with flexible fabric faces (providing coverage and aesthetics). This composite approach optimizes the strength-to-weight ratio by using each material where it is most effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If perimeter grooves with rubber profiles are used to secure fabric, then fabric binding is improved, but the method is complex and fabric tension is not maintained over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric binding effectivenessVSAvoidsecuring mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fabric securing system uses elastic constraining means that automatically maintain tension through their inherent elastic properties. The system is self-regulating, requiring no additional mechanisms or adjustments to maintain fabric tension over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses elastic materials with specific elastic moduli to create constraining means that dynamically adjust to maintain optimal fabric tension. The elastic properties allow the system to accommodate variations in fabric tension while maintaining secure binding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If perimeter swellings or continuous ribs are used to secure fabric, then fabric attachment is simplified, but elasticity is limited and fabric tension cannot be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric attachment easeVSAvoidfabric tension maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs elastic constraining means made from materials with high elastic properties, allowing significant deformation and recovery. This enables the system to maintain fabric tension reliably while remaining easy to manufacture and install.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a lightweight, easy-to-transport, and versatile wall that can be easily assembled and disassembled, with improved tension retention and aesthetic flexibility, suitable for various applications including temporary exhibitions and interior partitions.

Implementation Method 1

said opposing faces comprise elastic constraining means to maintain them tensioned and substantially parallel to a geometrical plane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8635814B2Wall for interior architecture
Publication Date: 2014.01.28 HENOTO SPA
  • US8635814B2 patent drawing
  • US8635814B2 patent drawing
  • US8635814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention is a wall for interior architecture, particularly for partitioning adjacent rooms, comprising a substantially rigid frame (2) suited to define an external perimeter surface (4) of the wall (1), and one pair of opposite faces (3) constrained to the rigid frame (2) and made of a flexible material. In particular, the opposite faces (3) comprise elastic constraining means (5) suited to maintain them tensioned and substantially parallel to a geometrical plane, while the rigid frame (2) and the opposite tensioned faces (3) delimit an internal hollow region (6).