Flexible Laminate Containers with Gas Barrier and Sealable Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rigid containers for fluent products are expensive to produce, require significant materials, are difficult to decorate, prone to damage, and challenging to dispense from, especially for users with limited hand strength.

Innovation Solution

Flexible containers made from laminated materials with a gas barrier layer and sealable layers, configured with novel support structures that reduce material usage and allow for easy decoration and dispensing, while maintaining structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid containers are used for fluent products, then structural integrity is improved, but manufacturing cost increases and material usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies flexible laminate materials with multiple layers including barrier layers, sealable layers, and reinforcement layers to create containers that are both structurally sound and material-efficient. The flexible material configuration provides sufficient strength while using less material than conventional rigid containers, directly resolving the contradiction between structural integrity and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite laminate structures combining different materials (e.g., metalized layers, polymer layers, barrier layers) to achieve optimal balance between strength, flexibility, and cost. This composite approach allows the container to have high structural integrity where needed while reducing overall material usage and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If rigid containers are used for fluent products, then structural integrity is improved, but material usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible laminate structure achieves sufficient structural integrity with thinner walls compared to rigid containers, directly reducing material usage. The multi-layer design provides strength through material composition rather than wall thickness, resolving the contradiction between maintaining strength and reducing material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

By using composite laminate materials with high strength-to-thickness ratios, the patent creates containers that maintain structural integrity while using significantly less material than conventional rigid containers, addressing the material usage concern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If rigid containers are used for fluent products, then structural integrity is improved, but ease of decoration worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidease of decoration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible outer surface of the laminate container provides an ideal substrate for decoration methods such as printing, stamping, or embossing, while the underlying laminate structure maintains structural integrity. This resolves the contradiction by allowing easy decoration on the flexible surface without compromising strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Strength

If rigid containers are used for fluent products, then structural integrity is improved, but ease of operation worsens for dispensing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidease of dispensing
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible container allows dynamic deformation during dispensing operations, enabling users to squeeze and manipulate the container easily to control product flow. The laminate structure maintains integrity during these dynamic operations while providing the flexibility needed for easy user operation, resolving the contradiction between strength and ease of dispensing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Flexible containers are cost-effective, use less material, are easier to decorate, less prone to damage, and allow for controlled dispensing of fluent products, while maintaining the ability to withstand handling and environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

the flexible material can include a first laminate comprising a first gas barrier layer disposed between first and second sealable layers, wherein the first and second sealable layers define opposed exterior layers of the first laminate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSealing: Welding

Implementation Method 2

which can create tension in the one or more flexible materials, to form an expanded structural support volume

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExpansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

a first laminate comprising a first gas barrier layer disposed between first and second sealable layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas barrier: Permeation

Data Source

PatentEP2846998B1Flexible materials for flexible containers
Publication Date: 2023.04.05 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • EP2846998B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2846998B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2846998B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

A flexible material for a flexible container can include a first laminate and a second laminate joined to at least a portion of the first laminate by at least one seal. The first laminate can include a first gas barrier layer disposed between first and second sealable layers, wherein the first and second sealable layers define opposed exterior layers of the first laminate. The second laminate can include a third sealable layer defining an exterior layer of the second laminate, and a second gas barrier layer. The at least one seal joins a portion of the third sealable layer to at least a portion of the second sealable layer.