Flexible Traffic Marker With Protective Flaps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing traffic control markers with reflective materials become marred or blackened after multiple impacts, reducing their effectiveness in providing visibility to drivers at night, leading to safety concerns and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A traffic control marker design featuring a flexible tube with a longitudinal channel that protects the reflective element by closing inward during impacts, or a marker with protective flaps that cover the reflective material, ensuring it remains visible and functional despite repeated collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If the reflective material is exposed on the surface of the traffic control marker, then the visibility to motorists is improved, but the reflective material becomes marred or blackened after multiple impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevisibilityVSAvoidreflective material durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The protective structure is divided into multiple flaps that can independently move and close during impact, allowing the reflective material to be segmented into protected and exposed zones. This segmentation enables the system to maintain visibility when not impacted while protecting the reflective material during impact events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protective flaps are designed to be dynamic rather than fixed - they remain open during normal operation to allow visibility but automatically close during vehicle impact. This dynamic behavior allows the same structure to serve both visibility and protection functions at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Duration of action of stationary object

If the traffic control marker is made more durable to withstand impacts, then the lifespan is extended, but the reflective material still becomes damaged due to direct exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelifespanVSAvoidimpact damage to reflective material
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The protective flaps act as an intermediary element between the vehicle impact and the reflective material. During impact, the flaps close to absorb and redirect the impact force away from the reflective material, preventing direct damage while allowing the marker body to remain durable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible tube and protective flaps are designed to deform and absorb impact energy before it reaches the reflective material. This beforehand cushioning protects the reflective material from the full force of impacts, extending its lifespan without requiring the entire marker to be overly robust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If protective structures are added to shield the reflective material, then the durability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereflective material protectionVSAvoidmarker structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective structure uses flexible flaps made from relatively simple materials that can be attached to the marker body. These thin, flexible elements provide effective protection while adding minimal complexity compared to rigid protective housings or complex mechanical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The protective flaps are designed to close automatically during impact through the force of the impact itself, without requiring external sensors, actuators, or control systems. This self-service mechanism reduces device complexity while maintaining effective protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Strength

If the marker body is made more robust to absorb impacts, then the impact resistance is improved, but the cost of materials and manufacturing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The marker body is designed with varying wall thicknesses - thicker in areas that need to absorb impact forces and thinner in areas where weight and cost are concerns. This local quality optimization provides necessary strength while minimizing material usage and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The marker employs composite construction combining the flexible tube body with attached protective flaps, potentially using different materials optimized for their specific functions. This composite approach allows cost-effective material selection for each component rather than using expensive materials throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly extends the lifespan of traffic control markers by protecting the reflective material from damage, maintaining visibility and safety for motorists while reducing replacement costs and frequencies.

Implementation Method 1

A vehicle's lights reflect off the reflective material on the traffic control marker, thereby indicating to the driver they should not cross the boundary indicated by the marker.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11619015B2Reflective traffic control marker
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 HUGHES JR ROBERT K
  • US11619015B2 patent drawing
  • US11619015B2 patent drawing
  • US11619015B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A traffic control marker is provided and described herein. The traffic control marker can be configured with a main marker body that is flexible and durable, the main marker body can be further configured with a reflective element that covers at least a portion of the main marker body. The main marker body can further be configured with an indentation or a channel that extends a portion of or alternatively the length of the main marker body. The reflective element is configured to be protected during a vehicle impact with the traffic control marker, such that at least a portion of the reflective element remains effective and reflective after the impact.