Flexible Massive MIMO Antenna Layout for Simpler Distributed Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed massive MIMO systems face challenges in installation complexity, cost, and performance due to the need for extensive cabling and precise antenna placement, as well as limitations in channel hardening and interference management, particularly in decentralized architectures.

Innovation Solution

An antenna arrangement with a flexible, elongated structure that integrates antenna elements and processing hardware within a single cable, allowing for distributed processing and power supply, and non-orthogonal antenna pairing to reduce installation width and complexity, while using weighted conjugate beamforming to enhance channel hardening.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If distributed massive MIMO systems use extensive cabling and precise antenna placement, then system performance and channel hardening are improved, but installation complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel hardeningVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple antenna elements and their associated processing hardware into integrated antenna units that can be deployed as discrete modules. This merging reduces installation complexity by pre-assembling complex configurations into standardized units while maintaining the performance benefits of distributed massive MIMO through coordinated operation of multiple units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is divided into multiple independent antenna units that can be deployed separately and then coordinated through digital signal processing. This segmentation allows for simpler individual unit installation while achieving channel hardening through the collective operation of many distributed units, resolving the contradiction between installation simplicity and system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Use of energy by moving object

If distributed massive MIMO systems use extensive cabling, then power supply and data transmission to antenna elements are enabled, but installation cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply to antenna elementsVSAvoidcabling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Power supply and data transmission functions are merged into integrated antenna units with embedded processing hardware. This consolidation eliminates the need for extensive separate cabling for power and data, as each unit is self-contained with its own power and processing capabilities, reducing installation complexity while maintaining full functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Each antenna unit is designed as a self-contained module with integrated power supply and processing capabilities. This self-service approach allows units to operate independently without requiring complex external cabling infrastructure, reducing installation complexity while maintaining the ability to provide power and data transmission functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If conventional multi-user MIMO uses frequency-division duplex operation, then system implementation is simplified, but throughput and radiated energy efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operational parameter from frequency-division duplex to time-division duplex mode. This parameter change enables the exploitation of channel reciprocity in TDD systems, allowing for improved throughput and energy efficiency through advanced signal processing techniques while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized TDD implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements channel state information feedback mechanisms that exploit channel reciprocity in TDD operation. Uplink pilot sequences are used to estimate downlink channels, creating a feedback loop that enables sophisticated precoding and beamforming techniques to improve throughput and energy efficiency while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If the number of base station antennas is increased, then spatial multiplexing and energy focus are improved, but hardware complexity and signal processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial multiplexingVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The large number of antennas are segmented into multiple distributed antenna units with embedded processing hardware. This segmentation distributes the hardware complexity across many simple, identical units rather than concentrating it in a single complex base station, enabling spatial multiplexing with reduced per-unit hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Digital signal processing acts as an intermediary that coordinates the operation of many simple antenna units to achieve the spatial multiplexing benefits of a large unified antenna array. The intermediary processing layer enables complex multi-antenna functionality while keeping individual antenna unit hardware simple and standardized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies installation, reduces costs, and improves performance by enabling flexible antenna deployment, efficient data and power transmission, and enhanced channel hardening, leading to better coverage and energy efficiency in massive MIMO systems.

Implementation Method 1

Each antenna element is arranged to face a respective direction and to be separated from its adjacent antenna elements by a respective distance in the respective direction in which the antenna element is facing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

By operating in TDD mode, massive MIMO exploits the channel reciprocity property, according to which the channel responses are the same in both uplink and downlink

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChannel reciprocity:

Implementation Method 3

By virtue of the law of large numbers, the effective scalar channel gain seen by each terminal is close to a deterministic constant. This is called channel hardening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChannel hardening:

Implementation Method 4

An antenna arrangement with a flexible, elongated structure that integrates antenna elements and processing hardware within a single cable, allowing for distributed processing and power supply

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal transmission: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS11799524B2Antenna arrangement for distributed massive MIMO
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11799524B2 patent drawing
  • US11799524B2 patent drawing
  • US11799524B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An antenna arrangement comprising a body comprising a plurality of antenna devices, the antenna arrangement being characterized in that the body having a flexible structure and an elongated shape and wherein the antennas are arranged in a non-orthogonal co-polarized manner.