Passive Flexible Panel Shutter for Countermeasure Launch Tubes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current countermeasure launch tube shutters are complex, fragile, and costly due to their electromechanical design, which complicates production and maintenance, and they lack watertightness and simplicity.

Innovation Solution

A fully passive, all-mechanical shutter design utilizing two flexible panels with complementary profiles and embedded magnets, which open and close automatically without actuators or electronic components, ensuring watertightness and simplicity, and are made from radar-invisible materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If electromechanical actuators and sensors are used to operate the shutter, then the shutter can be controlled to open and close, but the shutter becomes complex, fragile, and costly with difficult production and maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshutter controlVSAvoidshutter structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shutter panels are designed to operate automatically without external actuators or sensors. The panels use their own elastic properties to open when the countermeasure passes through and close when springing back to the undeformed position, making the system self-operating and eliminating complex control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the electromechanical actuator-sensor system with a purely mechanical elastic deformation mechanism. The flexible panels deform mechanically under the countermeasure's passage and return to their original shape through elastic recovery, substituting electronic control with mechanical self-action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If electromechanical shutters are used, then the shutter can be operated, but watertightness is compromised and production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshutter operationVSAvoidwatertightness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The shutter uses flexible panels made of elastomeric material that can deform elastically. These flexible panels form a continuous sealing surface that maintains watertightness while allowing mechanical deformation during operation, eliminating gaps or joints that would compromise sealing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Ease of operation

If electromechanical components are used in the shutter, then the shutter can be controlled, but the number of component parts increases and simplicity is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshutter controlVSAvoidnumber of component parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes all electromechanical components (actuators, sensors, electronic控制系统) from the shutter system. The shutter is reduced to its essential functional elements: flexible panels that deform and spring back, eliminating unnecessary components and achieving maximum simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using active components (actuators) to open and close the shutter, the invention uses passive elastic panels that automatically return to their undeformed position. The system inverts the conventional approach by relying on material elasticity rather than mechanical force application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a sturdy, low-cost, and easy-to-produce shutter that maintains watertightness and simplifies maintenance, eliminating the need for complex actuators and electronic components while ensuring effective countermeasure expulsion.

Implementation Method 1

first and second panel 15, 16 flex and deflect to permit expulsion of countermeasure 4 through shutter 1, which is opened by the forward movement of countermeasure 4. Once countermeasure 4 is expelled, panels 15, 16 spring back to the undeformed position to close central opening 12 automatically

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A fully passive, all-mechanical shutter design utilizing two flexible panels with complementary profiles and embedded magnets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP2314977B1Countermeasure lauch tube shutter
Publication Date: 2012.05.23 WHITEHEAD ALENIA SISTEMI SUBACQUEI
  • EP2314977B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2314977B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2314977B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A shutter for a launch tube (3) for launching a countermeasure (4), wherein a support (10) has a circular opening (12) of a diameter (D) equal to the diameter of the launch tube (3). The shutter has a first and second flexible panel (15, 16) fitted to the support (10) and which, when undeformed and at rest, close the circular opening. The panels (15, 16) flex and deflect, as a front end portion (6) of the countermeasure (4) moves through the circular opening (12), to permit expulsion of the countermeasure (4) through the shutter (1), which is opened by the forward movement of the countermeasure.