Flexible Spinal Implant Screw for Load-Sharing Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spinal implant systems, including screws and rods, often provide rigid fixation that stress-shields bone, leading to a lack of load-sharing and potential instability in spinal stabilization.

Innovation Solution

The development of an implantable screw with a unique design featuring a head portion, a shaft, and a middle portion that includes first and second members extending between the head and the shaft, allowing for elastic deformation under physiological loading to facilitate load-sharing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid fixation is used in spinal implants, then structural strength and stability are improved, but load-sharing capability deteriorates and bone stress-shielding occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidload-sharing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into distinct functional segments: a rigid head portion for anchoring, a flexible middle portion for load-sharing through deformation, and a threaded shaft for bone engagement. This segmentation allows each portion to perform its specialized function, resolving the contradiction between overall strength and localized load-sharing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The middle portion is designed to be dynamically flexible, allowing it to deform under physiological loads. This dynamic behavior enables the implant to share loads with the bone rather than providing rigid fixation, improving load-sharing capability while maintaining structural integrity through the rigid head and shaft portions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If rigid fixation is used in spinal implants, then immediate stability is improved, but bone stress-shielding and potential instability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmediate stabilityVSAvoidbone stress-shielding
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different portions of the implant have different mechanical properties: the head and shaft portions are rigid for stable anchoring, while the middle portion is flexible to allow stress transfer to the bone. This local differentiation of mechanical properties enables immediate stability from rigid portions while preventing bone stress-shielding through the flexible middle portion that permits controlled movement and stress transfer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If flexible design is used to enable load-sharing, then bone stress distribution is improved, but structural strength and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-sharing capabilityVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is segmented into rigid portions (head and shaft) that provide structural strength and a flexible middle portion that enables load-sharing. This segmentation allows the flexible portion to distribute bone stress while the rigid portions maintain overall structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant utilizes composite construction with portions made from materials having different mechanical properties. The rigid head and shaft provide strength, while the flexible middle portion (potentially using different material composition or structure) enables load-sharing and bone stress distribution, creating a composite structure that achieves both strength and flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables the screws to flex and displace under physiological loads, promoting load-sharing and reducing stress on the bone, thereby enhancing the stability and durability of spinal stabilization systems.

Implementation Method 1

applying a physiological load onto the first implantable screw and the second implantable screw to flex a middle section of each implantable screw and displace a proximal section relative to a distal section of each implantable screw

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20250120748A1Implantable screw and methods for use
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 RENESSELAER POLYTECHNIC INST
  • US20250120748A1 patent drawing
  • US20250120748A1 patent drawing
  • US20250120748A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure includes implantable screws, implants, and systems. The implantable screws including a proximal section, a distal section, and a middle section with two members coupling the proximal section and the distal section. The implantable screws may be used by applying a physiological load onto the first implantable screw and the second implantable screw to flex a middle section of each implantable screw and displace a proximal section relative to a distal section of each implantable screw.