Synchronous Motor Rotor With Flexible Teeth For Magnet Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In synchronous motors with tangentially magnetized magnets, production-related tolerances can lead to instability and detachment of magnets, causing asymmetry and increased cogging forces due to inadequate gap accommodation between magnets and teeth.

Innovation Solution

The rotor design features teeth connected via flexible joints that can deflect tangentially, allowing magnets to rest against outer stops, and optionally dividing magnets into outer and inner pieces for stable positioning, with inner pieces engaging with the rotor core to maintain symmetry despite dimensional variances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If tangentially magnetized magnets are inserted between teeth of the rotor to concentrate flux, then the magnetic flux from rotor to stator is maximized, but production tolerances cause gaps between magnets and teeth leading to instability and detachment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic fluxVSAvoidmagnet stability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The teeth are made flexible through a flexible joint connecting them to the rotor core, allowing the teeth to adapt their position dynamically. This flexibility enables the teeth to accommodate magnets within tolerance ranges while maintaining stable contact, resolving the contradiction between maximizing flux concentration and ensuring magnet stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible joint changes the mechanical parameters of the tooth structure, allowing for controlled deflection and position adjustment. This parameter change enables the system to absorb dimensional variations in magnets while maintaining reliable contact and flux concentration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If gaps between teeth are designed to accommodate magnets at the upper end of tolerance range, then larger magnets can be fitted, but smaller magnets create gaps leading to loss of rotor symmetry and increased cogging forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnet size accommodationVSAvoidrotor symmetry
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The flexible teeth can deflect to accommodate magnets of varying sizes within the tolerance range. This dynamic adjustment ensures that both smaller and larger magnets are retained stably, maintaining rotor symmetry and preventing increased cogging forces regardless of which end of the tolerance range the magnet dimensions fall into.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If teeth are made rigid to provide stable magnet retention, then magnets are securely held, but production tolerances cause gaps and detachment for magnets at the extremes of size variation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnet retentionVSAvoidtolerance accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By making the teeth flexible through the flexible joint, the system transforms from a rigid structure that cannot accommodate tolerance variations to a dynamic structure that adapts to different magnet sizes. This enables reliable magnet retention while accommodating the full range of production tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible joint introduces a change in the mechanical parameters of the tooth structure, allowing for position and shape adjustments that accommodate magnet dimensional variations while maintaining secure retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design ensures stable and symmetrical magnet placement, minimizing cogging forces and maintaining precise positioning by accommodating magnets of varying sizes through adaptive deflection and engagement mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

the teeth are connected to the rotor core via a flexible joint and that the teeth are deflected in the tangential direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the prevailing reluctance forces drive these magnets as far away as possible from the rotor core towards the ends of the teeth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic reluctance: Magnetic Reluctance

Data Source

PatentUS10826340B2Rotor for a synchronous motor
Publication Date: 2020.11.03 ETEL SA
  • US10826340B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotor for a synchronous motor includes teeth arranged at regular intervals, project from a rotor core in the radial direction, and taper in a cross-section in the direction of the rotor core. The rotor also includes tangentially magnetized magnets that are arranged in gaps between the teeth and are trapezoidal in cross-section. The teeth are connected via a flexible joint to the rotor core, and the teeth are deflected in the tangential direction such that in every other gap between two teeth, first magnets rest against outer stops at the ends of the teeth facing away from the rotor core.