Flexible Tongue Time Control for Micro-Machined Counterweight Delay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing micro-machined safety and arming devices for projectiles face challenges in reliably controlling the movement of counterweights, leading to unpredictable delays and increased complexity due to the zigzag movement mechanism and limited adjustable parameters.

Innovation Solution

A time control device for micro-machined counterweights featuring flexible tongues integral with the counterweight or housing, which cooperate with indentations to provide controlled friction and delay movement, eliminating the need for springs and ensuring reliable, reproducible delays.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If slight play and zigzag movement mechanism are used to delay counterweight movement, then time delay is achieved, but reliability and control precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay timeVSAvoiddelay control reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state of the tongue from rigid to flexible, allowing it to deform elastically during counterweight movement. This flexibility enables controlled friction and gradual movement, providing reliable and adjustable delay times without the unreliability of zigzag mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex zigzag mechanical movement system with a simpler flexible tongue mechanism that uses elastic deformation and friction to achieve the same time delay function, improving reliability and ease of control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If the number of indentations is increased to adjust delay, then delay precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay adjustment precisionVSAvoidcounterweight structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the tongue from rigid to flexible, enabling delay adjustment through the flexibility parameter rather than through the number of indentations. This allows continuous or fine-step adjustment of delay time without increasing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible tongue serves multiple functions: it provides the delaying action, acts as a spring element, and enables adjustable delay parameters, replacing the need for multiple indentations and associated complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a spring is added to control counterweight movement, then movement control improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement control reliabilityVSAvoiddevice structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the spring function and the delaying tongue function into a single integrated flexible tongue element. The tongue itself provides both the elastic restoring force and the friction-based delaying action, eliminating the need for a separate spring and reducing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible tongue performs multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as a spring, provides friction-based delaying, and controls counterweight movement, thereby improving reliability without requiring additional components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a reliable and controllable delay mechanism for counterweight movement, reducing complexity and eliminating the need for springs, while allowing for precise adjustment of delay parameters, enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of the delay.

Implementation Method 1

the at least one flexible tongue able to be deformed by bending during the displacement of the counterweight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the at least one flexible tongue able to be deformed by bending

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8714090B2Time control device for the movement of a micro-machined and safety and arming device comprising such a time control device
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 KNDS AMMO FRANCE
  • US8714090B2 patent drawing
  • US8714090B2 patent drawing
  • US8714090B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A time control device for the movement of a micro-machined or micro-engraved counterweight with respect to a substrate, said counterweight incorporating at least one face having at least one indentation intended to cooperate with at least one other indentation on a housing in which said counterweight moves so as to ensure the delaying of said movement of said counterweight, wherein said one indentation on said counterweight respectively on said housing receiving said counterweight is made on at least one flexible tongue itself integral with said counterweight respectively said housing, said at least one flexible tongue being able to be deformed by bending during the displacement of said counterweight.