Flexible Trainer Stand for Indoor Cycling Dynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing indoor cycling trainer stands fail to effectively simulate the dynamic movements and feedback of outdoor cycling, leading to reduced training effectiveness and potential safety hazards due to rigid structures and limited adaptability.

Innovation Solution

A flexible trainer stand comprising a bracket, flat plate, guide portions, and elastic devices that allow for adjustable force feedback and vertical movement simulation, including a lifting device for slope simulation, with a simple and lightweight design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed bike trainer is used for strength training, then the training effect is improved, but the fatigue wear of the bike connection position increases and safety hazards occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectVSAvoidconnection position durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dynamic support structure that can move forward and backward along the length direction of the flat plate, allowing the trainer stand to adapt to the dynamic forces generated during cycling. This dynamic movement distributes the stress away from fixed connection points, reducing fatigue wear while maintaining training effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure's position parameter is made variable, allowing it to move along the flat plate in response to cycling forces. This parameter change enables the system to absorb and distribute dynamic loads, preventing concentrated stress at fixed connection positions and extending component lifespan

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If an adjustable air bag rocker plate is used, then the adaptation to different weight ranges is improved, but the simulation of forward movement feedback is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight range adaptationVSAvoidforward movement feedback simulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a support structure that can dynamically move forward and backward along the flat plate, creating realistic feedback that simulates the forward movement sensation during cycling. This dynamic element complements the existing weight-adaptation capability, providing both versatility and authentic movement feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is designed as a separate, movable component that operates independently from the weight-adjustment mechanism. This segmentation allows the forward movement feedback function to be added without compromising the existing weight range adaptation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If a leaf spring pressing wheel with arc guide rail is used, then the force feedback effect is improved, but the structure complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce feedback effectVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a flexible flat plate as the base structure, which inherently provides force feedback through its elastic deformation. This flexible membrane approach replaces complex rigid mechanisms like leaf springs and arc guide rails, achieving force feedback with simpler, more cost-effective components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes complex mechanical force feedback mechanisms (leaf springs, pressing wheels, arc guide rails) with a more simple elastic support structure that provides comparable or superior feedback through material elasticity and dynamic movement, reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If an arc guide rail force feedback structure is used, then the left and right inclination feedback is improved, but the vertical center of gravity movement occurs which is inconsistent with actual cycling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinclination feedbackVSAvoidcenter of gravity stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure moves dynamically along the flat plate in a horizontal direction, providing inclination feedback without causing vertical center of gravity movement. This dynamic horizontal movement mechanism maintains user stability while delivering realistic cycling feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The flexible trainer stand provides realistic somatosensory feedback, adjustable force, and extended equipment lifespan, enhancing indoor cycling experience and comfort while supporting various training equipment.

Implementation Method 1

the elastic devices are symmetrically arranged at two ends of the beam. Each of the elastic devices includes one end fixedly connected with the beam, and the other end fixedly connected with the bottom end of the flat plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The first guide portion is slidably connected with the second guide portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12083402B2Flexible trainer stand for indoor cycling
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 QINGDAO MAGENE INTELLIGENCE TECH CO LTD
  • US12083402B2 patent drawing
  • US12083402B2 patent drawing
  • US12083402B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flexible trainer stand for indoor cycling includes a bracket, a flat plate, a first guide portion, a second guide portion, and elastic devices. The first guide portion and the second guide portion can slide relative to each other, which is configured for simulating forward and backward movement of a bike generated when a user accelerates and sprints. The first guide portion and the second guide portion can be inclined under an action of the elastic device, which is configured for simulating left and right inclination of the bike generated when the user is cycling and exerting force. A lifting device is arranged on the flat plate, which is configured for simulating position changes of the bike in a vertical direction when a slope changes. Somatosensory feedback of the user during outdoor cycling is truly simulated, and a feedback force can be adjusted.