Flight Control Actuator Allocation Using Online Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flight control systems face challenges in determining the optimal combination of actuators and associated parameters to achieve desired forces and moments in real-time, as they often rely on pre-computed solutions and heuristics, which are not comprehensive enough to handle all possible conditions and circumstances.

Innovation Solution

A flight control system that performs online optimization by modeling costs and constraints to determine an optimal mix of actuators and parameters in real-time, using techniques such as bounded-variable least-squares to minimize a cost function and enforce linear constraints, allowing for dynamic adjustment based on current aircraft state and conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If pre-computed solutions and heuristics are used to determine actuator combinations, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to all possible conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidhandling of all possible conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static pre-computed solutions to dynamic real-time optimization. The flight control system continuously solves optimization problems online to determine actuator combinations, allowing adaptation to changing flight conditions and unexpected scenarios that were not present in the pre-computed lookup tables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters from fixed pre-computed values to dynamically optimized values. By formulating and solving optimization problems with varying cost functions and constraints based on current flight state, the system adapts to all possible conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through structured mathematical approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If online optimization is performed to determine optimal actuator mix, then adaptability to all conditions improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling of all possible conditionsVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization problem is segmented into manageable components: cost function formulation, constraint definition, and solution computation. The system divides the complex actuator allocation problem into separate optimization objectives (power consumption, smooth transitions, saturation management) that can be addressed through structured mathematical programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical decision-making and heuristic algorithms with mathematical optimization techniques. By using bounded-variable least-squares and quadratic programming methods, the system achieves real-time optimization without requiring complex computational infrastructure, substituting mathematical elegance for computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If more actuators are used to achieve desired forces and moments, then performance and reliability improve, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveachievement of desired forces and momentsVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes actuator parameters (command values, deflection angles, thrust levels) to optimize power consumption while achieving desired forces and moments. The cost function explicitly penalizes high power consumption, and the optimization process finds parameter combinations that minimize energy use while satisfying performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts actuator usage based on real-time conditions. Rather than using fixed actuator combinations, the optimization process continuously determines the optimal mix of actuators and their parameters, allowing the system to achieve reliable performance while adapting power consumption to current flight conditions and actuator availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11787535B2Online optimization-based flight control system
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 WISK AERO LLC
  • US11787535B2 patent drawing
  • US11787535B2 patent drawing
  • US11787535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques to control flight of an aircraft are disclosed. In various embodiments, a set of inputs associated with a requested set of forces and moments to be applied to the aircraft is received. An optimal mix of actuators and associated actuator parameters to achieve to an extent practical the requested forces and moments is determined.