Flight Computer Angle-of-Attack Estimation from Body-Fixed Load Factors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In aerospace applications, determining the aerodynamic angle-of-attack for small vehicles is challenging due to the difficulty in accurately measuring or estimating this parameter without using external probes, which are often prohibitively expensive and/or impractical due to size and weight constraints.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing an accelerometer on the vehicle to determine body-fixed load factor measurements, which are then used to calculate an angle-of-attack parameter through a flight computer system without requiring a pitot-static system or external probes, allowing for direct determination and adjustment of the angle-of-attack for optimal lift-to-drag ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If external probes (vane, cone, or pressure probe) are used to directly measure angle-of-attack, then measurement accuracy is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangle-of-attack measurement accuracyVSAvoidprobe system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the angle-of-attack measurement function from external probes and relocates it to an onboard accelerometer system. By measuring body-fixed accelerations and deriving angle-of-attack through computation rather than direct external measurement, the system eliminates the need for complex external probe hardware while maintaining measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical probe system with an accelerometer-based measurement system. Instead of using physical probes that directly interact with the airflow to measure angle-of-attack, the system uses accelerometers to measure body-fixed accelerations and computationally derives the angle-of-attack, substituting mechanical measurement with inertial sensing and mathematical processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If pitot-static system is used to obtain accurate airspeed measurement for angle-of-attack estimation, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairspeed measurement accuracyVSAvoidpitot-static system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the airspeed measurement function from the pitot-static system and replaces it with an accelerometer-based approach. By using body-fixed acceleration measurements and deriving airspeed information through computational processing of inertial data, the system eliminates the need for pitot tubes and static ports while maintaining the capability to determine angle-of-attack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the pitot-static mechanical measurement system with an inertial measurement system. Instead of using pressure-based airspeed measurement, the system uses accelerometers to capture motion data and computationally derives the necessary flight parameters, replacing pressure-based mechanics with inertial sensing and mathematical computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If inertial measurement system is used to estimate angle-of-attack, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement system complexityVSAvoidangle-of-attack estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where body-fixed acceleration measurements are continuously processed through a monotonic portion of a lookup curve to determine angle-of-attack. The system uses the measured accelerations, applies appropriate transformations and quotients, and references a pre-determined monotonic portion of the angle-of-attack operating plot to accurately estimate the current angle-of-attack, ensuring measurement precision through systematic computational feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-determining the monotonic portion of the angle-of-attack operating plot before flight operations. This lookup curve is established in advance based on vehicle characteristics, allowing the onboard computer to quickly and accurately determine angle-of-attack during flight by simply referencing the pre-computed curve with current acceleration measurements, thereby improving real-time measurement precision without adding complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate determination and adjustment of the angle-of-attack for small vehicles, such as gliders, without the need for bulky or heavy sensors, thereby improving flight efficiency and maximizing distance coverage.

Implementation Method 1

determining, by an accelerometer disposed on the unpowered vehicle, first and second accelerometer outputs, where the first and second accelerometer outputs correspond to first and second body-fixed load factor measurements, respectively

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS11061410B2Angle-of-attack flight computer systems and methods
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US11061410B2 patent drawing
  • US11061410B2 patent drawing
  • US11061410B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one implementation of the present disclosure, a method for determining angle-of-attack for an unpowered vehicle is disclosed. The method includes: determining a monotonic portion of a look-up curve of an angle-of-attack operating plot; during flight, determining, by an accelerometer disposed on the unpowered vehicle, first and second accelerometer outputs, where the first and second accelerometer outputs correspond to first and second body-fixed load factor measurements, respectively; determining an operating point on the monotonic portion by applying a quotient of the first and second accelerometer outputs to the angle-of-attack operating plot; and determining an angle-of-attack parameter corresponding to the determined operating point.