Flight Craft Container With Elastic Restraining Cage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Airtight containers used in flight craft that ascend to high altitudes face challenges in maintaining structural integrity due to significant pressure differences between the internal and external environments, which can lead to wall cracking if the container walls are not sufficiently strong.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a container design featuring a main body that is airtight and a restraining member with a cage-like structure made of an elastic material, which adjusts to counteract the inward-to-outward force caused by pressure differences, thereby maintaining the structural integrity of the container.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If the container walls are made thin to reduce weight, then the weight of the container is reduced, but the container cannot withstand the pressure difference between internal and external environments at high altitudes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer weightVSAvoidpressure resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The container is divided into two functional parts: a thin-walled main body for weight reduction and a separate restraining member (cage-like structure) for providing strength. The restraining member consists of multiple reinforcing ribs that are segmented and distributed across the container surface, creating a composite structure that combines the advantages of both thin walls and strong reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The container employs a composite structure combining the main body wall and the restraining member with reinforcing ribs. This composite design allows the thin-walled main body to maintain low weight while the restraining member provides the necessary mechanical strength to withstand pressure differences, achieving both weight reduction and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the container walls are made thicker to withstand pressure difference, then the strength is improved, but the weight of the container increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure resistanceVSAvoidcontainer weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly thickening the entire container wall, the reinforcement is segmented into discrete reinforcing ribs that are strategically positioned on the restraining member. This segmentation allows strength to be concentrated only where needed to withstand pressure loads, rather than distributing unnecessary material throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcing ribs on the restraining member provide localized strength enhancement at critical areas of the container. The main body walls remain thin with uniform thickness, while the restraining member introduces localized reinforcement only where structural support is required, optimizing the distribution of material for both weight efficiency and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If an airtight container ascends to high altitude, then the internal environment can be maintained close to ground-level conditions, but the pressure difference between inside and outside causes significant force on the container walls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinternal environment stabilityVSAvoidpressure difference force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The restraining member with reinforcing ribs acts as a counterbalancing structural element that resists the outward force generated by the pressure difference. The ribs are designed to withstand and distribute the compressive and tensile forces acting on the container, providing mechanical counteraction to the pressure differential that arises from maintaining internal environment stability at high altitudes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively counteracts the pressure differences, ensuring the container's walls can withstand the forces without cracking, thus maintaining the airtightness and structural integrity of the container at high altitudes.

Implementation Method 1

a restraining member made of an elastic material having a cage-like structure and arranged to cover the main body; wherein the restraining member restrains a wall of the main body to generate a force that counteracts an inward to outward force that acts on the main body due to a difference between an internal and external pressure during flight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20250091707A1Container For Flight Craft, And Flight Craft Pressure
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 IWAYA INC
  • US20250091707A1 patent drawing
  • US20250091707A1 patent drawing
  • US20250091707A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A container for a flight craft is provided and comprises a main body that contains air and is airtight against an external space, and a restraining member having a cage-like structure and arranged to cover the main body, wherein the restraining member restrains a wall of the main body to generate a force that counteracts an inward to outward force that acts on the main body due to a difference between an internal and external pressure during flight. The flight craft may further comprise an adjusting mechanism that adjusts a length of a portion of the restraining member. The restraining member may be made of an elastic material.