Electric Aircraft Flight Control with Phase-Adaptive Input Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flight control systems for electric aircraft lack the ability to intuitively adapt to different phases of flight, leading to suboptimal control and pilot workload issues.

Innovation Solution

A flight control system that includes a propulsor, a pilot input mechanically coupled to the aircraft, a sensor to detect and transmit input data to a flight controller, and a flight controller that determines command data to control the propulsor based on the input data and an input mapping that changes with the phase of flight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a fixed input mapping is used in flight control systems, then the system structure is simple, but the control precision and adaptability deteriorate across different flight phases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic input mapping that automatically adjusts control characteristics based on the current flight phase (takeoff, climb, cruise, descent, landing). The flight controller continuously monitors flight parameters and modifies the mapping between pilot inputs and control commands in real-time, transforming a static control system into an adaptive one that optimizes precision for each operational context without requiring manual intervention from the pilot.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the mapping parameters dynamically according to flight phase. Different gain values, dead zones, and scaling factors are applied to control inputs depending on whether the aircraft is taking off, cruising, or landing. This parameter adaptation allows the same physical control device to provide optimal control precision across diverse flight conditions without increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the input mapping is dynamically adjusted for different flight phases, then the adaptability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to flight phasesVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight controller serves multiple functions: it monitors flight phase, determines appropriate mapping parameters, and generates control commands all within a single integrated system. The same control computer that manages basic flight stabilization also handles adaptive mapping adjustments, eliminating the need for separate dedicated systems for each function and thereby minimizing the increase in overall system complexity while maximizing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The flight control system automatically determines the current flight phase based on monitored parameters (altitude, speed, vertical rate) and self-adjusts the input mapping without pilot intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously configuring optimal control characteristics for each flight phase, reducing the need for complex manual configuration interfaces or additional pilot workload while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If adaptive input mapping is implemented, then pilot workload is reduced, but the processing requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot workloadVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight control system automatically determines the current flight phase based on monitored parameters (altitude, speed, vertical rate) and self-adjusts the input mapping without pilot intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously configuring optimal control characteristics for each flight phase, reducing the need for complex manual configuration interfaces or additional pilot workload while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors flight phase parameters and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the input mapping. The flight controller creates a closed-loop system where control characteristics are automatically refined based on real-time flight conditions, eliminating the need for pilots to manually adjust controls for different phases and thereby reducing workload while managing complexity through intelligent feedback-driven adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12204346B2Systems and methods for flight control for an electric aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 BETA AIR LLC
  • US12204346B2 patent drawing
  • US12204346B2 patent drawing
  • US12204346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for flight control on an electric aircraft. The system includes a propulsor configured to generate lift to propel an electric aircraft, a pilot input mechanically coupled to the electric aircraft, a sensor communicatively connected to the pilot input, and a flight controller communicatively connected to the sensor. Sensor is configured to detect an input datum from the pilot input and convert the input datum into a command datum for the propulsor as a function of input mapping. Input mapping is determined as a function of the phase of flight.