Flight Controller Boundary Enforcement for Pilot-Limited Aircraft Maneuvers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack the capability to accurately determine and maintain aircraft flight boundaries, considering various factors such as pilot experience and environmental conditions, which can lead to unsafe flight operations.

Innovation Solution

A flight controller system that receives flight data, determines flight boundaries, sets movement limits, and generates control signals to ensure the aircraft remains within those boundaries, taking into account pilot instructions and real-time data for safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a flight controller system is implemented to determine and enforce flight boundaries, then aircraft safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft safetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight controller is designed to perform multiple functions: receiving flight data from various sources, determining flight boundaries, setting movement limits, and generating control signals. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate systems into a single integrated controller, improving safety while managing complexity through functional integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives flight data, compares current aircraft state against determined flight boundaries, and generates control signals to maintain compliance. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures safety by constantly monitoring and adjusting aircraft behavior, while the automated nature of the feedback reduces the need for complex manual intervention systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If flight boundaries are dynamically updated during flight, then adaptability is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The flight boundary determination is designed to be dynamic rather than static. The controller can update flight boundaries during flight based on changing conditions such as environmental factors or mission requirements. This dynamic capability allows the system to adapt to varying operational contexts while maintaining precise boundary enforcement through continuous calculation and updating of movement limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system determines and sets flight boundaries and movement limits in advance before actual flight operations begin. This preliminary determination allows the system to prepare appropriate boundaries based on initial flight data, reducing the precision burden during actual flight by having pre-calculated reference values ready for comparison and enforcement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple factors are considered when determining flight boundaries, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight boundary accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight controller integrates multiple data processing functions into a single system, handling various flight data inputs and synthesizing them to determine comprehensive flight boundaries. This multi-functional design allows consideration of multiple factors without proportionally increasing overall system complexity, as the same controller handles diverse data types and decision-making processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple data sources and consideration factors into a unified flight boundary determination process. By merging these elements into a single integrated decision-making framework rather than separate systems, the patent achieves reliable multi-factor analysis while avoiding the complexity multiplication that would result from multiple independent systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11803197B2Systems and methods for controlling a flight boundary of an aircraft
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 BETA AIR LLC
  • US11803197B2 patent drawing
  • US11803197B2 patent drawing
  • US11803197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling a flight boundary of an aircraft. The system includes a flight controller communicatively connected to the aircraft. The flight controller is configured to receive a plurality of flight data linked with the aircraft, determine a flight boundary for the aircraft as a function of the plurality of flight data, set an aircraft movement limit as a function of the flight boundary, receive a pilot instruction, and generate a control signal for the aircraft as a function of the aircraft movement limit and the pilot instruction. The control signal is limits the aircraft to remain within the flight boundary. A method for controlling a flight boundary of an aircraft is also provided.