Flight Deck Simulation Feedback via Action Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional aircraft training simulations fail to distinguish between correct and incorrect operator actions, provide inadequate feedback, and lack the ability to collect data on trainee interactions, limiting the effectiveness of training and evaluation.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that utilize a simulated flight deck with action indicators and a training scenario controller to provide immediate feedback and data collection across different training modes, including guided, practice, and evaluation modes, allowing for the simulation of aircraft operations based on user interactions with simulated controls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional aircraft simulation is used, then aircraft operation can be simulated, but the system cannot distinguish between correct and incorrect operator actions or provide useful feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback informationVSAvoidsimulation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by having the simulation system detect user actions on simulated controls, determine whether each action is correct or incorrect based on the training scenario, and provide feedback indicators to guide the user. This resolves the contradiction by introducing structured feedback mechanisms that transform the simulation from a passive display to an active training tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary evaluation component that mediates between the user's actions and the simulation outcome. This intermediary detects control actions, evaluates them against the training scenario, and translates them into meaningful feedback, thereby enabling the system to distinguish correct from incorrect actions without requiring complex redesign of the entire simulation architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If conventional aircraft simulation is used, then aircraft operation can be simulated, but the system cannot collect useful data on operator interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator interaction dataVSAvoiddata collection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by having the simulation system automatically detect and record user actions on simulated controls during the training exercise. The system self-collects interaction data without requiring external observation or additional complex instrumentation, as the digital control interface inherently generates detectable action signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If flight training devices are located in separate individual training rooms, then focused training can be provided, but contact and dialogue with others outside of two students and an instructor is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining accessibilityVSAvoidcommunication capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing the simulation system to serve multiple functions: it provides individual focused training through the simulated flight deck while simultaneously enabling group evaluation and communication through the evaluation mode and data collection capabilities. The same hardware platform supports both isolated training and connected learning environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10796593B2Flight deck simulation and training system and method
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 THE BOEING CO
  • US10796593B2 patent drawing
  • US10796593B2 patent drawing
  • US10796593B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for training a user of an aircraft. Simulated controls for the aircraft are provided. A training scenario defines actions to be performed by the user with the simulated controls. An action indicator associated with at least one of the simulated controls is displayed based on the training scenario. Actions by the user with the simulated controls are detected. Operation of the aircraft is simulated based on the detected actions by the user with the simulated controls.