Flight Device Collision Avoidance via Distance Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As the number of unmanned flight devices, such as drones, increases, there is a growing need for safety measures to prevent collisions and ensure convenient operation, particularly in environments where multiple devices may be flying simultaneously.

Innovation Solution

A flight device and a structure that form a path with an evacuation space allow flight devices to determine if they are within a predetermined distance of another device and perform an avoidance action by changing their path to avoid collisions, using a combination of sensors and control systems to manage flight paths and prevent contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the number of flight devices is increased to expand applications, then productivity and application versatility are improved, but the risk of collision and safety hazards increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication expansionVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of distance to other flight devices before collision occurs. The control device continuously monitors relative positions and predicts potential collision scenarios in advance, allowing the flight device to prepare avoidance maneuvers proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback through distance determination between flight devices. The control device receives real-time position information, calculates relative distances, and adjusts flight paths dynamically based on this feedback loop, enabling adaptive collision avoidance in crowded aerial environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If avoidance actions are performed frequently to prevent collisions, then safety is improved, but flight path stability and operation convenience deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidflight path stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts avoidance actions based on real-time conditions. The control device determines whether avoidance is necessary by evaluating distance thresholds and relative motion vectors, performing path adjustments only when collision risk is actualized rather than continuously, thus maintaining flight stability while ensuring safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes flight path parameters selectively based on determined distance conditions. When the distance to other flight devices exceeds safe thresholds, the original path is maintained; when thresholds are approached, path parameters are modified to execute avoidance maneuvers, optimizing the balance between safety and operational smoothness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If distance determination and avoidance control systems are added to flight devices, then collision prevention capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device performs multiple functions using integrated processing: distance determination, collision risk assessment, path planning, and avoidance execution all occur within the same control system. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate dedicated systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The flight device autonomously performs distance determination and avoidance maneuvers without requiring external intervention. The control device independently processes sensor data, determines collision risks, and executes avoidance actions, reducing the complexity of external control infrastructure needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11915600B2Flight device, method for controlling flight device, program for controlling flight device, and structure for forming path of flight device
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 KYOCERA CORP
  • US11915600B2 patent drawing
  • US11915600B2 patent drawing
  • US11915600B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a flight device that performs, on the basis of a determination that a distance to another flight device is within a predetermined distance, a predetermined avoidance action to avoid the other flight device.