Flight Object Management for Dynamic Flight Plan Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complex and dynamic nature of commercial flight planning makes it labor-intensive and prone to errors, requiring efficient tools for real-time optimization and communication across multiple systems, while existing automated systems struggle to balance various factors like cost, time, fuel, passenger comfort, and safety.

Innovation Solution

The development of a system and method for processing and managing flight information through 'flight objects' that optimize flight plans in real-time, allowing dynamic generation, updating, and communication of flight data across multiple systems, incorporating real-time, historical, and predicted data to prioritize optimization preferences such as cost, time, fuel, passenger comfort, and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated flight management tools are implemented, then productivity and error reduction are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight plan generation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments flight plan management into distinct functional modules: flight plan generation, real-time monitoring, automated updates, and communication interfaces. Each module handles specific tasks independently, improving productivity while containing complexity within manageable segments rather than a monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The automated flight management system is designed as a multi-functional platform that handles flight plan creation, real-time tracking, weather integration, fuel optimization, and communication with multiple stakeholders (pilots, dispatchers, air traffic control). This universal approach consolidates multiple tools into one system, improving overall productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If real-time dynamic updates are implemented, then reliability and safety are improved, but loss of time in processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight plan accuracyVSAvoidupdate processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating multiple flight plan alternatives and pre-loading weather, airspace, and aircraft performance data before flight departure. When real-time updates are needed, the system can quickly select and adjust from pre-prepared options, maintaining high reliability while minimizing processing time during critical flight phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that automatically monitor flight parameters, weather conditions, and airspace changes. When deviations are detected, the system automatically generates update recommendations and can implement corrections without requiring manual intervention, ensuring reliability while reducing the time loss associated with human processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple system communications are integrated, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem interoperabilityVSAvoidcommunication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs standardized communication interfaces and data exchange protocols as intermediaries between different flight management systems, weather services, air traffic control systems, and airline operations centers. This intermediary layer enables adaptable communication across multiple systems while containing complexity within the interface standards rather than requiring complex point-to-point integrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If comprehensive flight considerations are balanced, then reliability is improved, but loss of time in decision-making increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight plan optimizationVSAvoidplanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by implementing tiered optimization: critical factors (safety, regulatory compliance, aircraft performance) are fully optimized with comprehensive analysis, while secondary factors (fuel efficiency, passenger comfort preferences) use simplified models or default settings. This approach achieves reliable flight plans by focusing computational resources on essential considerations while reducing time loss on less critical decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9443434B2Flight path discontinuities
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 THE BOEING CO
  • US9443434B2 patent drawing
  • US9443434B2 patent drawing
  • US9443434B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for processing aircraft flight information and flight plan information are described. Specific techniques are described for managing flight data in real time, sharing flight data between a plurality of systems, dynamically managing flight information, generating flight plan information, providing flight plan information to a user, and closing flight plan discontinuities.