Flight Plan Modification for Focus Boom Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Supersonic vehicles generate sonic booms that cause damage and disturbance, and existing systems struggle to adjust flight plans to avoid focus booms, which are intensified by maneuvers and geographic features, leading to restrictions on supersonic operations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that receive speed, altitude, and flight path data to identify maneuvers generating focus booms and adjust speed, altitude, attitude, and turn radius to minimize or avoid sonic booms, using processors to update the flight plan based on permissible threshold boom values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If supersonic vehicles perform maneuvers (pushovers, acceleration, turns) to optimize flight path, then flight efficiency and speed are improved, but focus booms are generated causing structural damage and noise disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupersonic speedVSAvoidfocus boom damage and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the flight path to identify potential focus boom locations before the vehicle reaches them. By calculating boom footprints and identifying intersection points in advance, the system can proactively adjust flight parameters (altitude, speed, attitude) to avoid generating focus booms, rather than reacting after damage occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes flight parameters (altitude, speed, attitude, turn radius) to avoid focus boom generation. By adjusting these parameters based on real-time analysis of boom footprint intersections and geographic features, the system maintains supersonic operation while preventing harmful focus booms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If flight plans are adjusted to avoid focus booms by modifying maneuvers, then harmful effects are reduced, but flight plan complexity and adjustment requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesonic boom impactVSAvoidflight plan adjustment system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is self-regulating, automatically analyzing flight path data, identifying focus boom risks, and generating corrective maneuvers without external intervention. The autonomous nature of the system reduces the need for complex external control mechanisms while effectively managing sonic boom impacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors flight parameters and boom footprint intersections, using this feedback to dynamically adjust the flight plan. This closed-loop control enables the system to adapt to changing conditions and maintain compliance with sonic boom restrictions without requiring overly complex predetermined flight plans

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If minimum altitude requirements are enforced to reduce sonic boom intensity, then boom strength is reduced, but flight time and operational efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesonic boom intensityVSAvoidflight time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of enforcing uniform minimum altitude restrictions across entire flight paths, the system applies localized altitude adjustments only in specific areas where focus booms would occur. By targeting corrections to boom footprint intersection zones rather than the entire route, the system maintains low altitudes (and thus short flight times) while still preventing harmful focus booms in critical areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient adjustments to flight plans to minimize or avoid sonic and focus booms, ensuring compliance with sonic boom restrictions and reducing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

Supersonic vehicles, for example, supersonic aircraft, generate a sonic boom when traveling faster than the speed of sound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock wave: Shock Wave

Implementation Method 2

geographic features of the ground, such as hills, valleys, and mountains, can reflect shock waves of the sonic boom, which may increase the intensity of the sonic boom

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11694559B2Methods and systems for modifying a flight plan based on focus boom detection
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11694559B2 patent drawing
  • US11694559B2 patent drawing
  • US11694559B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods, systems, and a non-transitory computer-readable medium for modifying a flight plan of a vehicle. The method may include identifying a maneuver of a flight path that will generate a focus boom, based on received flight path data and permissible threshold boom values for locations along a boom footprint of the maneuver, and generating an adjustment to at least one of a speed, an altitude, an attitude, a location, and a turn radius of the maneuver based on the received data and the permissible threshold boom values. In addition, the method may include updating the flight plan based on the generated adjustment to the at least one of the speed, the altitude, the attitude, the location, and the turn radius of the at least one maneuver.