Autonomous Flight Planning Using 3D Spatial Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flight planning systems for autonomous aerial vehicles require an initial flyover to create a detailed survey plan, which is inefficient and resource-intensive, especially for complex environments, and often necessitates manual interventions and iterative modifications.

Innovation Solution

The system generates flight plans using 3D spatial models and precision obstacle databases, allowing for remote planning that computes absolute or relative position values to survey static or movable targets without an initial flyover, enhancing dispatcher productivity and operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If an initial flyover is conducted to create a detailed survey plan, then the flight plan can be based on actual imaging data of the survey target, but it requires additional time and resources for the preliminary flyover

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurvey accuracyVSAvoidtime for initial flyover
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by retrieving pre-existing 3D spatial models, terrain data, and obstacle information from databases before flight plan generation. This eliminates the need for a preliminary flyover while still enabling accurate flight planning based on comprehensive spatial information about the survey target and environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copied data from external sources (3D spatial models from databases, terrain models, obstacle databases) instead of creating new data through preliminary flights. These copied spatial representations are sufficient for generating accurate flight plans without requiring physical reconnaissance flights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual interventions and iterative modifications are used to design flight plans, then the flight plan can be adjusted to meet specific mission requirements, but it increases device complexity and reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight plan customizationVSAvoiddispatcher productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically generating flight plans using the received spatial model and mission parameters. The processor autonomously computes the flight plan without requiring manual intervention or iterative modifications by dispatchers, thereby maintaining adaptability while significantly improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables flight plan customization through parameter changes by accepting mission-specific parameters (such as survey altitude, speed, imaging parameters) and automatically adjusting the flight plan accordingly. This maintains versatility while eliminating manual complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a two-dimensional navigation map is used for flyover planning, then the system can operate with simpler data requirements, but it cannot provide complete survey coverage of three-dimensional structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing complexityVSAvoidsurvey completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from two-dimensional navigation maps to three-dimensional spatial models for flight plan generation. By using 3D spatial information about the survey target and environment, the system achieves complete survey coverage of three-dimensional structures while the processor handles the complexity of 3D path planning automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11600185B2Systems and methods for flight planning for conducting surveys by autonomous aerial vehicles
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US11600185B2 patent drawing
  • US11600185B2 patent drawing
  • US11600185B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides systems and methods for flight planning for an autonomous aerial vehicle. The systems and methods perform a processor executed process of receiving a request for flight planning and retrieving a model for the structure or the feature of interest from one or more databases. The request identifies a structure or a feature of interest to be surveyed by the autonomous aerial vehicle. The one or more databases include a database including models of terrain, airports and obstacles or a database including models of manufactured articles based on original equipment manufacturer (OEM) specifications or computer aided design (CAD) models. The process includes computing a flight plan that completely surveys the structure or completely surveys the feature of interest based on the retrieved model. The flight plan defines a search pattern with position values. The process includes uplinking the flight plan to the autonomous aerial vehicle.