Flight Preparation Event Detection Using Bounding Box Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft turnaround delays due to flight preparation issues, such as baggage handling, maintenance, and fueling, lead to cascading effects like missed connections, increased costs, and customer dissatisfaction, necessitating efficient delay detection and management systems.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing cameras and trained models to detect flight preparation events by analyzing bounding box data from images, generating alerts for potential delays, and enabling proactive management through aircraft turnaround management systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual monitoring and detection methods are used for flight preparation events, then system complexity is reduced, but detection accuracy and reliability deteriorate due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human monitoring with an automated computer vision system that uses cameras, bounding box detection algorithms, and trained models to automatically detect flight preparation events. This substitution eliminates human error in detection while managing system complexity through standardized automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-monitoring and self-detection of flight preparation events without requiring continuous human intervention. The automated detection system continuously monitors aircraft stand activities, generates alerts autonomously, and provides real-time updates, enabling the system to serve itself in the detection and monitoring function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If automated detection systems with multiple cameras and models are deployed, then detection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection precisionVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection system into specialized functional modules: camera subsystems for capturing images, bounding box detection algorithms for object localization, trained models for event recognition, and alert generation systems for delay notification. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to achieve high detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system is designed to monitor multiple types of flight preparation events simultaneously using a unified framework. The same camera network and processing system detect various events including baggage handling, maintenance activities, fueling operations, and aircraft movements, making the system universally applicable to different event types without requiring separate specialized systems for each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If real-time monitoring of all flight preparation events is implemented, then response time to delays improves, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay response timeVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and classification of potential delay events before they fully manifest as problems. By continuously monitoring and identifying early signs of delays through automated detection, the system enables proactive intervention and mitigation strategies, reducing the actual impact of delays while maintaining cost-effective operations through early warning rather than reactive response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where detected events are immediately processed, alerts are generated and communicated to relevant stakeholders, and the system learns from historical data to improve future detection accuracy. This feedback mechanism ensures timely response to delays while optimizing resource allocation by focusing attention on actual high-impact events rather than continuously monitoring all activities equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250095381A1Flight preparation event detection
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 THE BOEING CO
  • US20250095381A1 patent drawing
  • US20250095381A1 patent drawing
  • US20250095381A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device includes one or more processors configured to obtain bounding box data indicating a first location history of a first bounding box associated with a first object detected in images. The one or more processors are also configured to process, using a trained model, at least the first location history to detect an event associated with flight preparation of an aircraft. The one or more processors are further configured to generate an output indicating the event.