Flight Procedure Validation via Synchronized Visual Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for validating flight procedures in civil aviation rely heavily on subjective pilot judgment and lack objective tools for safety evaluation, flight ability assessment, and human factor evaluation, leading to inconsistent results and uncertainty in obstacle detection and clearance.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing an image capturing apparatus, storage device, data recorder, and data processing module to synchronize and play actual and simulation videos, generating alarms and 3D images for comprehensive evaluation of flight procedures, providing objective and accurate references.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If practical flight inspection by pilot is used for safety evaluation, then the evaluation can be performed with existing human resources, but the validation result is overly dependent on subjective perception and experience leading to inconsistency and error probability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation result consistencyVSAvoidobjective measurement system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the flight procedure by importing design data into a three-dimensional virtual scene. This virtual model replicates the actual flight path, obstacles, and environmental conditions, allowing objective validation without relying on pilot subjectivity. The virtual scene serves as a digital twin that can be repeatedly analyzed with consistent results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary system consisting of image capturing devices, data recorders, and processing modules that mediate between the actual flight and the validation process. These devices objectively record flight parameters and compare them against the virtual model, eliminating direct human subjectivity from the validation judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If sensory judgment of pilot is used for obstacle detection, then no additional equipment is needed, but the probability of error exists and large uncertainty exists in determining obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection accuracyVSAvoidimage capturing and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical human sensory system with electronic image capturing devices and automated processing systems. Cameras and sensors objectively detect obstacles and record flight parameters, while software algorithms process this data to identify and validate obstacles, eliminating human sensory limitations and subjectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-validation by automatically comparing recorded flight data against the virtual three-dimensional model. The processing module autonomously identifies discrepancies, validates obstacles, and generates validation results without requiring human interpretation, thereby improving precision and eliminating human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If three-dimensional animation simulation is used for flight reproduction, then basic flight state can be visualized, but lack detailed information of obstacles, artificial building and lighting environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight environment detail informationVSAvoidimage capturing apparatus and data recorder
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by capturing and recording detailed environmental data (obstacles, buildings, lighting) during actual flight inspections before validation. This recorded data is then integrated into the virtual three-dimensional scene, enriching the simulation with authentic detailed information that enhances the realism and accuracy of the virtual environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If practical flight inspection is used for flight ability evaluation, then actual flight conditions can be assessed, but no comparison with design scheme and design specification is available

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight procedure validation accuracyVSAvoiddata processing module
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by automatically comparing recorded flight data against the virtual three-dimensional model and design specifications. The processing module provides real-time feedback on whether the actual flight path, altitude, and parameters conform to the designed flight procedure, enabling precise validation and identification of deviations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9902503B2System and method for inspecting and validating flight procedure
Publication Date: 2018.02.27 FLIGHT INSPECTION CENT OF CAAC
  • US9902503B2 patent drawing
  • US9902503B2 patent drawing
  • US9902503B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system and method for inspecting and validating a flight procedure used in the field of civil aviation. The system comprises an image capturing apparatus, a storage device, a playing device, a recorder such as QAR, a data processing module and a synchronization module; the method for inspecting and validating a flight procedure applied in the system includes the following steps: collecting actual visual videos and flight parameters, generating simulation visual videos, generating over-limit alarms, processing data, generating complex simulation visual videos, generating flight trajectory and flight procedure protection area pictures, and synchronizing and playing the videos. With the application of the system and the method, the defects of the prior art can be overcome, artificial sensory factors are more avoided, the general condition of an aircraft itself at each time point during the execution of the flight procedure are accurately reflected, and objective and accurate references are provided for designers and approvers of the flight procedure.