Flight Record Procedure Assignment via Trajectory Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft operators lack knowledge of the procedures actually flown during flights, leading to complications in retrospective analysis and limited insight into the costs and impacts associated with different procedures.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for analyzing flight records to map flight data to predefined aircraft procedures, determining adherence metrics, and assigning procedures based on flight trajectories, enabling performance analysis and identification of anomalous deviations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If air traffic control assigns procedures during flight, then procedures can be dynamically adjusted based on real-time conditions, but aircraft operators lack knowledge of what procedures will be flown prior to flight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic procedure adjustmentVSAvoidprocedure information availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and storing procedure information from published charts before flights occur. This allows the procedure database to be pre-populated with all possible procedures, enabling both real-time assignment capability and retrospective analysis without losing procedure information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary procedure database that sits between the published procedure charts and the flight analysis system. This intermediary stores and manages procedure information, allowing it to be retrieved for both pre-flight planning and post-flight analysis, thus bridging the information gap.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If procedures are assigned by air traffic control during flight, then real-time operational flexibility is improved, but retrospective analysis of flown procedures becomes complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time operational flexibilityVSAvoidprocedure analysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by capturing actual flown procedure data during flights and comparing it against the database of published procedures. This feedback loop enables retrospective analysis by matching observed flight paths with expected procedure parameters, allowing precise measurement of procedure adherence despite dynamic assignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates copies of published procedure definitions and stores them in a searchable database. These procedural templates serve as reference copies that can be matched against actual flight data, enabling accurate retrospective analysis without requiring the original charts during analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If procedure specifications in published charts are followed exactly, then procedure definition precision is maintained, but actual flown procedures will likely deviate from exact specifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure specification accuracyVSAvoidprocedure adherence in practice
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by transitioning from static procedure specifications to dynamic procedure analysis. Instead of requiring exact matches to published charts, the system adapts to actual flown paths by comparing key parameters and determining the most likely intended procedure, thus accommodating real-world variations while maintaining analytical rigor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of information

If aircraft operators want to analyze costs and impacts of different procedures, then operational insight is improved, but the lack of knowledge regarding flown procedures limits analysis capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure knowledge availabilityVSAvoidretrospective analysis efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments procedure information into distinct, analyzable components such as procedure identifiers, waypoints, altitudes, and timing parameters. This segmentation allows the system to match flight data against procedure definitions systematically, enabling efficient retrospective analysis of costs and operational impacts by individual procedure elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3764340B1Methods and systems for assigning procedures to flight records
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 HONEYWELL AEROSPACE SAS
  • EP3764340B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3764340B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3764340B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for analyzing flight records to assign procedures to the flight records. One method involves identifying a set of procedures for potential association with a flight record based at least in part on a runway associated with the flight record, identifying a probable procedure from among the set of procedures based on a relationship between a trajectory associated with the probable procedure and flight data associated with the flight record, and updating the flight record to maintain an association with the probable procedure. The flown trajectory represented by the flight data is mapped to the procedure trajectories to identify the probable procedure executed during the flight associated with the flight record based on the relative adherence of the flown trajectory to the procedural legs that constitute the procedure trajectory.