Flight Component Signal Authentication for Hardware Power-State Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft systems face challenges in securely and efficiently controlling the power states of high-voltage components like inverters and actuators without relying on processors and software, which are prone to failure and require complex wiring.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a hardware circuit, such as a programmable logic device, to authenticate bus signals and control the power states of components like inverters and actuators based on pre-programmed identifiers, ensuring secure and reliable transitions independent of software and processor control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If processor and software control is used to manage power states of flight components, then operational flexibility and control capability are improved, but system reliability deteriorates due to susceptibility to software failures and hacking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system into two independent parts: a hardware circuit layer that handles power state transitions and a software layer that handles operational control. The hardware circuit contains an authenticator that verifies commands from flight controllers before executing power state changes, isolating critical power management from software vulnerabilities while maintaining communication bus integration for system coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional wiring harnesses are used to connect flight controllers to components, then electrical connections are established, but device complexity increases due to extensive wiring requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewiring simplicityVSAvoidwiring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical wiring system with an electrical communication bus system. Flight controllers and flight components communicate through digital signals on the communication bus, eliminating the need for extensive point-to-point wiring harnesses. The hardware circuit on the flight component receives authenticated commands from flight controllers via the bus, reducing physical wiring complexity while maintaining system connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If hardware circuits are used to control power states independently of software, then system reliability and security are improved, but operational flexibility may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an authenticator as an intermediary between the communication bus and the power state control logic. The authenticator verifies commands from flight controllers using stored identifiers before allowing power state transitions. This intermediary layer ensures that only authenticated commands can change power states, maintaining reliability while allowing the flight control system to manage operational flexibility through the communication bus interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250368324A1Flight component signal authentication
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 BETA AIR LLC
  • US20250368324A1 patent drawing
  • US20250368324A1 patent drawing
  • US20250368324A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and techniques for state control of a flight component of an electric aircraft that includes a high voltage connection to a power supply of the electric aircraft and a communication connection to a communication system of the electric aircraft. The flight component is configured with a hardware circuit designed and configured to receive and/or read a signal on the communication system, compare an identifier of the signal against a stored identifier of the flight component, and in response to the identifier matching the stored identifier, cause the flight component to change from a first state to a second state.