Flight Test Hinge Assembly Strain Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing test hinge assemblies for aircraft components often require redesign or retrofitting to accommodate strain gauges, leading to increased costs and reduced accuracy in structural load validation measurements due to the need for larger pins or bolts, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A test hinge assembly with a statically determinate design that positions strain gauges on external surfaces of interconnected beams and joints, allowing for accurate force measurement without the need for internal hollowing or redesign, using a monitoring system to calculate forces based on strain data from these gauges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If strain gages are positioned inside hollowed-out portions of pins or bolts, then force measurement capability is achieved, but the pin or bolt must be redesigned with larger diameter to accommodate the strain gage, increasing manufacturing complexity and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce measurement capabilityVSAvoidpin or bolt redesign
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The strain gages are relocated from the internal hollowed-out portions of pins to the external surfaces of the test hinge assembly's beams. This dimensional relocation eliminates the need to hollow out pins or bolts, maintaining their structural integrity while achieving force measurement capability through strain detection on external beam surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The test hinge assembly acts as an intermediary between the fastening members (pins or bolts) and the strain gages. Instead of attaching strain gages directly to pins or bolts, the assembly transfers forces through its beams, allowing strain gages to measure these forces on the beam surfaces without modifying the pins or bolts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If larger diameter pins or bolts are used to accommodate strain gages, then strain gage installation is possible, but the accuracy of flight test structural load validation measurements is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrain gage installationVSAvoidflight test measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Strain measurement is moved from internal pin/bolt surfaces to external beam surfaces of the test hinge assembly. This allows strain gages to be installed on larger, more accessible surfaces without requiring larger diameter fastening members, thereby maintaining measurement accuracy while improving ease of installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If control surfaces are redesigned to accommodate test hinge, then strain gage measurement is enabled, but the process is time and labor intensive, increasing manufacturing and testing costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrain gage measurement capabilityVSAvoidredesign time and labor
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The test hinge assembly is designed as a universal, modular component that can be applied to various control surfaces without requiring custom redesign of each control surface. The assembly includes standardized beams, connecting joints, and fastening member channels that can accommodate different applications, significantly reducing design and manufacturing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The test hinge assembly is pre-designed and pre-assembled with all necessary components (beams, connecting joints, fastening member channels) before installation. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for time-consuming on-site modifications or custom fabrication, allowing rapid deployment across different control surface applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If standard pins or bolts are replaced with stronger, hollowed-out replacements, then strain gage accommodation is achieved, but the cost increases due to more expensive replacement hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrain gage installationVSAvoidhardware cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The test hinge assembly serves as an intermediary structure that carries the strain gages on its beams rather than requiring modification of the fastening members themselves. This allows standard, unmodified pins or bolts to be used, eliminating the need for expensive hollowed-out or reinforced fastening members while still achieving complete force measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides accurate and efficient measurement of forces exerted on aircraft components, reducing the need for extensive revisions and increasing the accuracy of flight test data while maintaining compatibility with standard hardware.

Implementation Method 1

at least one strain gage secured to an outer surface of the at least one beam, wherein the at least one strain gage is configured to detect one or more strains exerted into the at least one beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain: Deformation

Data Source

PatentEP2966428B1Flight test hinge assembly
Publication Date: 2018.03.07 THE BOEING CO
  • EP2966428B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2966428B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2966428B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A system for calculating forces exerted into an aircraft component (12) may include a test hinge assembly (10) and a monitoring system (18). The test hinge assembly (10) may be a triangular shaped assembly, and may include at least one beam 22, 24, 28, at least one connecting joint 26, 34, 42 having a channel (46, 48, 50) configured to receive and retain a fastening member, and at least one strain gage (60) secured to an outer surface of the beam(s) (22, 24, 28). The strain gage(s) (60) is configured to detect one or more strains exerted into the beam(s) (22, 24, 28). The monitoring system (18) is in communication with the strain gage(s) (60). The monitoring system (18) may be configured to calculate forces exerted into the fastening member(s) by analyzing the strain(s) (60) exerted into the beam(s) (22, 24, 28).