Automated Flight Training Scheduling System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manual systems for flight training scheduling are inefficient, leading to substantial time consumption and frequent errors in certifying pilots for new aircraft types, as they lack automation and often result in sub-optimal training sequences.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that accesses flight training syllabi and schedules, using computer processors to assign trainees and instructors to flights based on defined criteria, optimizing the sequence of events to minimize time between flights and ensure complete training regimens.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual systems are used for flight training scheduling, then flexibility in monitoring and adjustment is maintained, but time consumption and error frequency increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining certification speedVSAvoidtime for scheduling and monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical scheduling processes with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to generate and optimize training schedules, eliminating the need for manual monitoring and reducing time consumption while maintaining scheduling flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automated self-scheduling where the computer automatically generates optimal training sequences and assigns flights without requiring manual intervention, allowing the system to serve itself in terms of schedule management and reducing human time investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual monitoring of training sequences is performed, then adaptability to individual trainee needs is possible, but error frequency increases due to human oversight requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of training sequence completionVSAvoidoversight and monitoring effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feedback mechanisms where the system continuously tracks trainee progress through each training event, automatically verifies completion status, and provides real-time feedback on sequence adherence, eliminating human error while maintaining monitoring capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The computer system acts as an intermediary between trainees and instructors, automatically managing the scheduling and monitoring functions that previously required direct human oversight, thereby reducing complexity while ensuring accurate tracking of training progression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated scheduling is implemented, then time consumption and error frequency are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecertification efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the automated scheduling system to perform multiple functions including schedule generation, flight assignment, progress tracking, and compliance verification within a single integrated platform, reducing the need for multiple separate systems while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses configurable parameters and algorithms that can be adjusted based on specific training requirements, allowing the same core system to handle different training scenarios without requiring complex customizations, thereby managing system complexity while maintaining flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240304108A1Automated flight training and scheduling
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 JEPPESEN FOREFLIGHT INC
  • US20240304108A1 patent drawing
  • US20240304108A1 patent drawing
  • US20240304108A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides techniques for scheduling and monitoring of event progress. A syllabus indicating flight training requirements for pilots and flight information for a plurality of scheduled flights is accessed. A first set of flight alternatives, from the plurality of scheduled flights, is identified, for a first trainee, based on the syllabus. The first trainee is assigned to a first subset of one or more flights, from the first set of flight alternatives, based on defined scheduling criteria. One or more instructors are assigned to each flight of the first subset of one or more flights.