Float-Actuated Flap Valve for Automatic Water-Level Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing water-level control systems for farming land are labor-intensive, costly, prone to malfunction, and unreliable due to manual operation, accumulation of debris, and uncertain opening/closing mechanisms, making them inefficient for managing water levels and irrigation needs.

Innovation Solution

A water-level control unit with a hinged lower flap portion and a floating body that automatically adjusts to water levels, ensuring reliable and efficient operation by opening or closing based on buoyancy forces, allowing for one-way or two-way water flow control, and easy installation and maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual operation of level boxes is used to control water drainage, then water-level control is achievable, but labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater-level controlVSAvoidlabor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through automatic float-actuated mechanisms that open or close valve flaps based on water level without human intervention. The float rises with water level to automatically open valves for drainage, and falls to close them, eliminating manual operation while maintaining reliable water-level control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operation with automatic mechanical systems using floats and linkages. The float mechanism converts water level changes into automatic valve actuation, substituting human labor with a self-actuating mechanical system that responds to water level conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If gate valves are used in level boxes, then water-level control is possible, but dirt and sewage accumulation causes clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater-level controlVSAvoiddebris clogging
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional gate valve approach by using downwardly hanging flap valves that close at the bottom rather than gates that lift from the bottom. The flap valve design allows debris to pass through more easily while maintaining sealing, reversing the problematic accumulation pattern of traditional gates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the valve from a gate lifting mechanism to a flap rotating mechanism. The flap valve rotates on a hinge axis and closes at the bottom position, changing the flow dynamics and debris interaction parameters to prevent clogging while maintaining water-level control functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Extent of automation

If automated gate valve rotation is implemented, then water-level control responsiveness improves, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic operationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex automated drive systems with simple float-actuated mechanical linkages. The float directly connects to the valve flap through a hinge mechanism, eliminating the need for motors, sensors, and control electronics while achieving automatic responsive operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service automation where the float automatically detects water level changes and actuates the valve flap through direct mechanical connection. The system serves itself by using the buoyancy force of the float to open valves when water rises and gravity to close them when water falls, without external control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If multiple level boxes are installed across drainage pipes, then water-level control coverage improves, but installation cost and labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater-level control coverageVSAvoidinstallation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by installing multiple independent valve units at different locations along drainage pipes. Each unit is a self-contained module with its own float and flap valve, allowing distributed water-level control across the drainage system while maintaining individual simplicity for easy installation and maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides reliable, economical, and user-friendly water-level management, enabling efficient water storage and irrigation, reducing manual labor, and minimizing maintenance, while adapting to local conditions and weather changes.

Implementation Method 1

The floating body (14) is configured for moving the valve element (7) from its closed position towards its open position in dependence of a rising level of water at the first upstream side (FS) in the flow channel (3)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentEP4511541B1A water-level control unit with a downwardly hanging hinged lower flap portion of a valve element and a floating body connected thereto
Publication Date: 2026.01.14 VERBEEK MARK GERARD JAAK ANTOON
  • EP4511541B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1d
  • EP4511541B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP4511541B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b

AI summary

A water-level control unit (1) comprises a housing (2) with a flow channel (3). A valve element (7) is positioned rotatable around a hinge axis (5) inside the flow channel to close off a lower section (LS) of the flow channel while dividing it in a first upstream side (FS) and a second downstream side (SS). The hinge axis is provided at a height (y1) above a bottom of the flow channel. The valve element comprises a lower flap portion (7lo) that in a closed position hangs down from the hinge axis. A floating body (14) is provided at and connected to a side of the lower flap portion for moving the valve element from its closed towards an open position in dependence of a rising level of water (Lw) at the first upstream side in the flow channel.