Mechanical Float Gate Control for Nonlinear Basin Leveling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional liquid level control systems in vessels or basins, such as clarifiers in sewage treatment plants, fail to efficiently manage non-linear changes in flow due to head losses through midstream devices without electrical controls, leading to potential surging or flushing issues.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical float-driven liquid level control system using a float and counterweight mechanism, where the float applies sufficient force to move the gate and counterweight to maintain equilibrium, controlling the gate's opening and closing to manage flow and prevent surging, even in the absence of an overflow weir.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a simple float, counterweight or spring controlled valve or gate is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the liquid level control performance deteriorates due to non-linear changes in flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidliquid level control performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the counterweight position variable rather than fixed. The counterweight moves along a curved track as the gate opens and closes, dynamically adjusting its position to maintain proper balance throughout the range of motion. This dynamic adjustment allows the simple mechanical system to compensate for non-linear flow changes and maintain reliable liquid level control without requiring complex electrical controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If an overflow weir is used, then the liquid level control is simplified, but it cannot be used in cases where midstream devices are needed for flow distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidcompatibility with midstream devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the universality principle by creating a gate control system that can function in multiple scenarios. The mechanical float-driven gate with dynamically positioned counterweight can serve both as a liquid level control mechanism and as a flow distribution system when combined with midstream devices. This versatile design replaces the need for separate overflow weirs while maintaining compatibility with various flow distribution configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If electrical controls are used to handle non-linear flow changes, then the liquid level control performance is improved, but the cost and reliability deteriorate due to potential electrical outages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid level control performanceVSAvoidsystem cost and electrical dependency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the self-service principle by designing a completely mechanical system that uses the natural forces present in the system itself to control liquid level. The float automatically detects level changes, and the counterweight dynamically positions itself to maintain balance, all without external power sources or electrical controls. This self-regulating mechanical system achieves reliable liquid level control while avoiding the costs and reliability issues associated with electrical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively maintains controlled outflow and prevents sudden surging or flushing of water, ensuring stable liquid levels within desired parameters, regardless of changes in flow rates, without the need for electrical components.

Implementation Method 1

a float serves as the 'actuator', applying just sufficient force to move the gate and place the counterweight at the correct position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

All have a counterweight or counter force that controls gate opening and closing so that a controlled outflow of water is maintained under all conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

there are equal opening and closing forces on the flap gate. The float serves prior to equilibrium as a moving force and at equilibrium, a holding force which holds the gate in the ideal location where the counterweight creates the right amount of moment to counteract the moment created from the liquid flowing through the gate and the hydraulic pressure pushing the gate open

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment: Moment of Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS11479943B2Buoyant mechanical liquid level control
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 OVIVO WATER INC
  • US11479943B2 patent drawing
  • US11479943B2 patent drawing
  • US11479943B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A liquid level control system, which may be used with a clarifier in a sewage treatment plant, manages liquid level of an upstream basin by controlling liquid flow in or out of a system that may use a midstream device to equally distribute flow in or out of the basin. This headloss inducing device creates a non-linear relationship between upstream liquid level to be controlled and the lesser downstream liquid level behind the gate or valve. Without the use of electrical controls, the systems of the invention include a gate or valve with counterforces that manage the outflow stream of liquid while accounting for the non-linear head loss created by the midstream device, thus reaching a desired liquid level range for all system flowrates.