Floatable Transmission Dock Maintaining Connection Stability
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional transmission docks for electronic devices fail to maintain a secure connection during vibrations or shocks, leading to interruptions in charging and data transmission.
Innovation Solution
A transmission dock with a floatable connecting component that includes a body with a transmission interface and limiting structures, allowing for movement relative to the dock's casing to maintain a stable electrical connection despite external disturbances.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a fixed connection interface is used in the transmission dock, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the connection becomes insecure when the device is hit or shaken
Solution Approach 1:
The connecting component is designed to be movable rather than fixed, allowing it to adjust its position dynamically in response to external shocks or vibrations. The component can move within the receiving chamber along predetermined paths defined by limiting structures, maintaining reliable electrical contact despite physical disturbances to the device or dock.
Solution Approach 2:
The position parameters of the connecting component are allowed to change within certain limits. The limiting structures define the range of motion and guide the movement of the connecting component, enabling it to adapt its spatial parameters to maintain secure electrical connection while accommodating external impacts.
2Reliability
If the connecting component is made movable to maintain connection during shaking, then connection stability improves, but the device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The connecting component incorporates movable elements that can shift position dynamically. This dynamic capability allows the connection to maintain continuity during device shaking or impact, preventing charging interruptions while managing complexity through controlled movement rather than fixed rigid connections.
Solution Approach 2:
The limiting structures serve as intermediary elements between the fixed dock and the movable connecting component. These structures guide and constrain the movement of the connecting component, providing a simple mechanical mediation that ensures stable connection without requiring complex active control systems.
3Reliability
If limiting structures are added to guide the floatable component, then connection stability during impact improves, but manufacturing complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The limiting structures are designed to work with the natural movement tendencies of the connecting component. By providing simple guiding constraints rather than rigid fixed positions, the system achieves reliable connection during impact while maintaining ease of assembly through intuitive mechanical guidance.
Solution Approach 2:
The limiting structures are segmented into discrete guide elements that can be independently manufactured and assembled. This segmentation allows for simplified manufacturing of each component while collectively providing comprehensive guidance for the floatable connecting component's movement within the receiving chamber.
Data Source
AI summary
A transmission dock for an electronic device includes a casing and a floatable connecting component. The casing includes a receiving chamber and two first limiting structures. A through opening is disposed at the bottom of the receiving chamber. The first limiting structures flank the through opening. The floatable connecting component includes a body, a transmission interface, and two second limiting structures. The body is movably disposed in the through opening. The transmission interface is disposed on the body. The second limiting structures are disposed on two opposing sides of the body, respectively. The second limiting structures and the first limiting structures moveably mate with each other, respectively, and limit each other, respectively.