Floating Gate Test Structure for Charged Particle Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current test structures for detecting charged particles in semiconductor processes are complex and costly, failing to effectively monitor production wafers and reflect the status of semiconductor devices accurately.

Innovation Solution

A simplified test structure comprising a semiconductor substrate with doped regions, an insulating layer, and a conductive layer in a floating state, where the conductive layer partially overlaps the doped regions, allowing for the measurement of breakdown voltage shifts to indicate charged particle accumulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a complicated test structure such as E2PROM is used to detect charged particles, then the detection capability is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharged particle detection capabilityVSAvoidtest structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test structure is segmented into essential functional components only: a semiconductor substrate with doped regions, insulating layer, and floating conductive layer. This segmentation removes unnecessary complex structures while retaining the core detection function for charged particles, thereby reducing manufacturing cost without significantly compromising detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and retains only the essential elements needed for charged particle detection from complex structures like E2PROM. By taking out the core detection mechanism (doped regions, insulating layer, floating conductive layer) and eliminating redundant components, the structure becomes simpler and less costly while maintaining detection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If a simplified test structure is used to reduce manufacturing cost, then the cost decreases, but the detection accuracy may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest structure simplicityVSAvoidcharged particle detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The simplified test structure employs local quality optimization by carefully designing the doping concentrations and profiles in specific regions. The doped regions are engineered with precise local properties to ensure adequate detection sensitivity, while other parts of the structure remain simple. This allows cost reduction through simplification without sacrificing detection accuracy in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes parameter changes in the floating conductive layer and doped regions to enhance detection capability within the simplified structure. By adjusting parameters such as layer thickness, doping concentration, and material properties, the structure achieves effective charged particle detection despite its simplicity, maintaining accuracy while reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If monitoring wafers are used to detect process divergence, then the process stability monitoring is improved, but the ability to reflect production wafer status is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess stability monitoringVSAvoidproduction wafer status reflection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The simplified test structure is designed with universality to serve multiple functions: it can be used for both process stability monitoring and production wafer status reflection. The same basic structure (doped regions, insulating layer, floating conductive layer) can be applied across different wafer types and process conditions, making it adaptable while maintaining reliable detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces manufacturing costs, integrates easily into semiconductor processes, and enhances detection signals by plotting I-V curves, enabling effective monitoring of charged particles on production wafers.

Implementation Method 1

a breakdown voltage (Vbd) between the first doped region and the second doped region is measured

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBreakdown voltage: Avalanche Breakdown

Data Source

PatentUS9070652B2Test structure for semiconductor process and method for monitoring semiconductor process
Publication Date: 2015.06.30 UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US9070652B2 patent drawing
  • US9070652B2 patent drawing
  • US9070652B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A monitoring method of a semiconductor process includes the following steps. A semiconductor substrate is provided, and a test structure is formed thereon. The method of forming the test structure includes the following steps. A first doped region and a second doped region are formed in the semiconductor substrate, and an insulating layer is formed on the semiconductor substrate. Subsequently, a conductive layer is directly formed on the insulating layer to complete the formation of the test structure, in which the conductive layer in a floating state partially overlaps the first doped region and partially overlaps the second doped region. Then, a voltage signal is applied to the test structure and the breakdown voltage (Vbd) between the first doped region and the second doped region is measured.