Floating Gas Transfer Membranes for Constant-Depth Wastewater Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Membrane biofilm reactors (MBfRs) have not been widely commercialized or scaled-up due to challenges in maintaining consistent depth of submergence and integration with existing wastewater treatment plants, limiting their effectiveness and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A floating membrane-supported biofilm unit that maintains a constant depth of submergence, allowing for flexible installation and operation in existing tanks, with integrated gas supply and monitoring systems to optimize biofilm growth and process efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If membrane biofilm reactors are installed in existing wastewater treatment plants, then treatment capacity is enhanced, but integration challenges and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment capacityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor system is divided into modular components including removable membrane modules, separate floatation mechanisms, and independent gas supply systems. This segmentation allows for easier installation, maintenance, and integration into existing treatment plants without requiring complete system overhaul.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The membrane modules serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide structural support for biofilm growth, act as gas transfer membranes for oxygen supply, and function as removable units for easy maintenance. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed, simplifying integration into existing facilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If membrane modules are kept at constant depth of submergence, then gas transfer efficiency is optimized, but mechanical control systems become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas transfer efficiencyVSAvoiddepth control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Floatation devices are attached to the membrane modules to provide buoyant force that counteracts the weight of the modules and maintains them at the desired depth. This passive buoyancy-based depth control eliminates the need for complex active mechanical positioning systems while ensuring optimal submergence depth for efficient gas transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Productivity

If gas is supplied continuously at high pressure, then biofilm growth is enhanced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiofilm growth rateVSAvoidgas supply energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous high-pressure gas supply, the system uses periodic or intermittent gas dosing through controlled valve operation. This periodic action maintains sufficient oxygen levels for biofilm growth while significantly reducing the energy required for gas compression and supply compared to continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The gas supply pressure and flow rate are dynamically adjusted based on operational conditions, biofilm maturity, and treatment requirements. By changing these parameters adaptively rather than maintaining constant high pressure, the system optimizes biofilm growth while minimizing energy consumption for gas supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient wastewater treatment with reduced energy consumption and enhanced capacity, adaptable to changing conditions, and compatible with existing infrastructure without disrupting plant operations.

Implementation Method 1

An exemplary floating unit has a frame and one or more floats. The frame holds modules or other structures with membranes.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

a gas permeable membrane to which a biofilm is attached. The module is provided with means for supplying gas to an inner surface of the membrane opposite the biofilm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas permeation: Permeation

Data Source

PatentUS12577137B2Process for water treatment using immersed gas transfer membranes
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 BL TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12577137B2 patent drawing
  • US12577137B2 patent drawing
  • US12577137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus has a plurality of gas transfer membranes. The apparatus floats in water with the membranes submerged in the water. To treat the water, a gas is supplied to the membranes and is transferred to a biofilm supported on the membranes or to the water. Gas is also used to supply mixing or membrane scouring bubbles to the water. The mixing or scouring bubbles can be provided by a cyclic aeration or other gas supply system, which optionally provides gas at a variable pressure to the membranes in parallel or series with an aerator. Condensates can be removed from the membranes, and exhaust gasses from the membranes can be monitored, optionally through one or more dedicated pipes.