Polygonal Floating Offshore Structure for Deep-Water Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Offshore wind power generation structures face challenges in deep water due to increased size requirements, fatigue failure risks, and high installation costs, limiting their deployment beyond shallow waters.

Innovation Solution

A floating offshore structure with a polygonal shape formed by columns and pontoons, where pontoons have a greater cross-sectional area parallel to sea level, and are connected by braces and dampers, allowing for installation regardless of water depth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If fixed type structures are used in deep water, then installation stability is improved, but structure size becomes too large and fatigue failure risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation stabilityVSAvoidstructure size
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static fixed structures to dynamic floating structures that move with environmental loads. The floating structure includes a floating body with mooring lines that allow controlled movement, converting the rigid fixed structure into a flexible system that adapts to wave and current forces, thereby maintaining stability without excessive size in deep water.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental installation parameter from fixed seabed anchoring to floating on water surface. This parameter change allows the structure to operate in deep water without the size constraints that plague fixed structures, as the floating body derives support from buoyancy rather than requiring massive foundation elements anchored to the seabed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If fixed type structures are used, then structural deformation response to environmental load is improved, but manufacturing and installation cost increases astronomically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural deformation responseVSAvoidmanufacturing and installation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The floating structure uses dynamic response to environmental loads through mooring lines and floating body movement, rather than rigid structural deformation. This reduces the need for expensive, oversized structural components while maintaining adequate strength to withstand storms and waves, thereby reducing manufacturing and installation costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If floating type structures are used, then adaptability to deep water is improved, but structural stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to deep waterVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses buoyancy as a counteracting force to gravity, creating a stable floating equilibrium. The floating body's displaced water weight counterbalances the structure's weight, providing inherent stability in deep water without requiring fixed seabed anchoring. This buoyant counterweight mechanism enables deep water adaptability while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The mooring lines are pre-configured with appropriate tension and length to provide preliminary stabilization before environmental loads act on the structure. This preliminary action ensures the floating structure maintains proper positioning and stability when deployed in deep water, preventing excessive drift or rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If pontoons are installed inside polygonal shape formed by columns, then ease of operation is improved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a nested configuration where pontoons are positioned inside the polygonal framework formed by vertical columns. This nesting arrangement integrates multiple structural functions into a compact geometry, where the inner pontoons provide buoyancy and the outer columns provide structural support, creating an operationally efficient design without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables stable installation and operation of offshore power generation systems in varying water depths without structural deformation or increased costs, leveraging buoyancy and mooring forces.

Implementation Method 1

the floating type floats on the surface of the water and is subjected to self-weight, buoyancy, environmental load and mooring force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of dampers, each of the plurality of dampers being connected to each of the pontoons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous damping: Viscous Damping

Data Source

PatentEP4667346A1Floating offshore structure and floating offshore power generation apparatus having same
Publication Date: 2025.12.24 HD HYUNDAI HEAVY IND CO LTD
  • EP4667346A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4667346A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4667346A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A floating offshore structure of the present disclosure includes: a plurality of columns; and a plurality of pontoons installed at lower ends of the columns, respectively, wherein a polygonal shape is formed by an imaginary line connecting the columns, the pontoons are installed inside the polygonal shape, a cross-sectional area in a direction parallel to sea level of the pontoons is greater than or equal to the cross-sectional area in the direction parallel to the sea level of the columns, and the pontoons may have a shape protruding outward at the lower ends of the columns.