Floating Offshore Structure with Segmented Support Legs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing floating offshore wind structures are limited to nominal outputs of up to 10 MW and lack redundancy for stability, particularly in the event of ship collisions, and are sensitive to sea conditions.

Innovation Solution

A floating offshore structure with a foundation featuring a coherent base body and support legs composed of multiple parallel support tubes, providing buoyancy and stability, with deep ballasting tanks and loose anchoring to allow for movement with the sea, and redundant support leg design to maintain stability in case of damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional floating offshore structures are used, then they can support wind turbines up to 10 MW, but they lack redundancy and are sensitive to ship collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability redundancyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support legs are divided into multiple separate tubes (at least two) that are connected by cross-bracing. This segmentation provides redundancy - if one tube is damaged by a ship collision, the others remain intact to maintain structural stability. The cross-bracing connects these segmented tubes while preserving the overall structural integrity needed for high-capacity wind turbines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple support tubes are used to provide redundancy, then collision resistance improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision sensitivityVSAvoidsupport leg complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple support tubes are merged into a unified structural system through cross-bracing elements. This combining approach distributes collision forces across multiple tubes while maintaining the redundancy needed for collision resistance. The cross-bracing merges the individual tubes into a coordinated system that resists harmful collision forces more effectively than a single tube could.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Stability of the object's composition

If deep ballasting tanks are used, then weight stability and reduced draft are achieved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The deep ballasting tanks serve multiple functions: they provide weight stability by positioning the center of gravity low, reduce draft to enable easier deployment, and can be configured with adjustable ballast water levels to adapt to different sea conditions and wind turbine capacities. This multi-functionality justifies the manufacturing complexity by delivering multiple performance benefits from a single structural feature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure achieves weight-stable floating with reduced draft and enhanced stability, allowing for higher output capacities and improved resilience to collisions and sea conditions, while maintaining flexibility and alignment with wind directions.

Implementation Method 1

The foundation generates a buoyancy that keeps both the foundation and the superstructure floating in position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

Support legs extend from the base body and lead to a transition piece on which the superstructure, in particular the wind turbine, is arranged

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStructural support:

Implementation Method 3

The offshore structure is designed to float in an operating position, ensuring weight stability

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP3922845B1Floating offshore structure and method of installation
Publication Date: 2024.08.21 TRACTEBEL OVERDICK GMBH
  • EP3922845B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3922845B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3922845B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a floating offshore structure (11) with a superstructure (2) and a foundation (1) with a continuous base body (8) with at least one ballast tank and with support legs (4a, 4b, 5a, 5b, 6a, 6b) extending from the base body, which lead to a transition piece (3) on which the superstructure (2) is arranged, wherein the support legs (4, 5, 6) at least partially comprise at least two adjacent support leg tubes (4a, 4b, 5a, 5b, 6a, 6b) and the offshore structure (11) floats in a weight-stable operating position.