Floating Support Damping Plate with Varying Cross-Section

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing offshore wind turbine floating supports with damping plates are not sufficiently resistant due to low thickness and specific shape, which affects their ability to effectively dampen heaving, pitching, and rolling movements.

Innovation Solution

A marine wind turbine with a floating support featuring a damping plate that has a varying horizontal section with depth, a minimum surface area greater than the main float, and a frustoconical shape, providing increased strength and hydrodynamic efficiency, along with notches and/or projections for enhanced structural resistance and damping performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the damping plate has low thickness and specific shape, then the device complexity is reduced, but the strength and resistance of the damping plate deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping plate structureVSAvoiddamping plate resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The damping plate employs varying thickness across different zones: thinner at the periphery for hydrodynamic efficiency and damping performance, and thicker at the central root area for structural strength and resistance. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing each region for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The damping plate features a frustoconical shape with curved surfaces instead of flat planes. This curvature optimizes hydrodynamic performance while the gradual transition from thin to thick sections provides structural integrity, resolving the contradiction between simplified structure and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Ease of manufacture

If the damping plate has low thickness, then the manufacturing cost and device complexity are reduced, but the hydrodynamic damping capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping plate fabricationVSAvoiddamping performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The damping plate is designed with peripheral regions of low thickness for optimal hydrodynamic damping and central regions of high thickness for structural integrity. This local differentiation allows the plate to achieve excellent damping performance without requiring uniform thickness throughout, balancing manufacturability with reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The thickness parameter of the damping plate varies continuously from the periphery to the center, creating a gradient structure. This parameter change optimizes both hydrodynamic performance (thin edges) and structural reliability (thick center) while maintaining ease of manufacture through a systematic design approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the damping plate has a frustoconical shape with varying section, then the hydrodynamic efficiency is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrodynamic damping capabilityVSAvoiddamping plate geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frustoconical shape with curved surfaces provides superior hydrodynamic efficiency compared to flat plates. The specific half-angle range (15-60 degrees) optimizes the balance between hydrodynamic performance and structural feasibility, achieving reliable damping capability while maintaining reasonable geometric simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The damping plate geometry is defined by controlled parameter variations (thickness, radius, angle) following a frustoconical profile. This systematic parameter change creates an optimized hydrodynamic shape without arbitrary complexity, as the geometry can be described by a few key parameters within specific ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the structural resistance and hydrodynamic damping capabilities of the floating support, effectively reducing movements and ensuring stability under wind and wave forces.

Implementation Method 1

The damping plate protrudes from the float to dampen the heave, pitch, and roll movements of the floating support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic damping: Damping

Implementation Method 2

The damping plate has a variable section with the depth, so as to be efficient from a hydrodynamic point of view

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic effect: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP3490883B1Marine wind turbine comprising a wind turbine and a floating support
Publication Date: 2024.02.21 IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES
  • EP3490883B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3c
  • EP3490883B1 patent drawingFigure 4~7

AI summary

The present invention relates to a floating support structure (1) having a main floater (2) and a damping plate (3). The damping plate (3) has a cross-section that varies with depth. Furthermore, the damping plate (3) has a minimum horizontal cross-section Sd1 greater than the horizontal cross-section Sc of the main floater (2).