Floating Aquatic Support Apparatus with Anti-Rotation Guide Groove

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional floating-type on-water support apparatuses allow the support rod to rotate about its central axis, causing wind power generators installed on the rod to face away from the wind, thereby reducing power generation efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus includes a ball with a guide groove, a floating unit with a restriction protrusion that fits into the guide groove, and a support rod that stands vertically with one end heavier than the other. The restriction protrusion prevents the ball from rotating about the support rod's axis, maintaining the support rod's orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the ball is supported by a floating part allowing rotation, then the support rod can rotate about the ball, but the support rod rotates about its central axis causing wind power generators to face away from the wind

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation capability of support rodVSAvoidpower generation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotation capability is segmented into two independent degrees of freedom: rotation of the ball about the support rod axis (allowed for adaptability) and rotation of the support rod about its own central axis (restricted to maintain orientation). The guide groove structure separates these rotational movements, allowing the ball to rotate while constraining the support rod from rotating about its axis, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and power generation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the support rod is coupled to the ball without restriction, then the structure can adapt to wind direction changes, but the support rod rotates about its axis reducing power generation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewind direction adaptationVSAvoidpower loss from misalignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The guide groove acts as an intermediary mechanism between the ball and support rod. It mediates the rotational movement by allowing the ball to rotate about the support rod axis while preventing the support rod from rotating about its own axis. This intermediary structure enables wind direction adaptation through ball rotation while maintaining generator alignment, eliminating the harmful power loss from misalignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the restriction protrusion is added to prevent rotation, then power generation efficiency is maintained, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower generation efficiencyVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The restriction function is applied locally at the interface between the ball and support rod through the guide groove and restriction protrusion. Instead of adding a complex global constraint mechanism, the invention uses a simple localized structural feature (the guide groove with restriction protrusion) that selectively prevents rotation about the support rod axis while allowing rotation about the ball center. This local quality approach maintains power generation efficiency with minimal added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design prevents the support rod from rotating about its axis, ensuring that wind power generators installed on the rod remain oriented towards the wind, thereby enhancing power generation efficiency and reducing the risk of damage from severe loads.

Implementation Method 1

a floating part which floats on water and supports the ball

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

a restriction protrusion fitted into the guide groove to restrict the ball from being rotated about an axis of the support rod

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

the other end is heavier than the one end so that the support rod stands vertically

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS12240569B2Floating type aquatic support apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 KIM SU HWAN
  • US12240569B2 patent drawing
  • US12240569B2 patent drawing
  • US12240569B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a floating-type on-water support apparatus comprising: a ball in which a guide groove is formed along a circumferential surface thereof; a floating unit including a floating part which floats on water and supports the ball so that the ball is rotatable; and a support rod of which one end is exposed above the water so that a structure is installable thereon and the other end is heavier than the one end so that the support rod stands vertically and which passes through the circumferential surface and is coupled to the ball, wherein the floating unit further includes a restriction protrusion fitted into the guide groove to restrict the ball from being rotated about an axis of the support rod.