Flood Forecasting Model Using Multi-Source Rainfall Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional flood forecasting methods have limited lead times due to poor timeliness of rainfall data, low accuracy, and focus on hydrological simulation rather than forecasting, with evaluation criteria only suitable for single lead times, failing to effectively predict floods at multiple lead times.

Innovation Solution

A method that combines rainfall data from radars, gauges, and precipitation micro-physical characteristics sensors to obtain hydrological variables, estimates mean concentration time, and uses an optimized hydrological model with a specific objective function to predict streamflow at multiple lead times, enhancing forecasting accuracy and providing early warnings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If conventional methods use real-time observed rainfall data from gauges, then the data is available, but the lead time of forecast is relatively short due to poor timeliness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelead time of forecastVSAvoidtimeliness of observed rainfall
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using radar and satellite data to predict future rainfall before it occurs. The system generates predicted rainfall data for future time periods, allowing flood forecasts to be made in advance rather than waiting for actual rainfall measurements to be collected and transmitted from gauges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If conventional methods use weather-predicted rainfall data, then the lead time is extended, but the forecasting accuracy is relatively low due to uncertainty of weather-predicted rainfall

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelead time of forecastVSAvoidforecasting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by using an objective function that compares predicted streamflow with observed streamflow data. The model parameters are iteratively adjusted to minimize the difference between predicted and observed values, thereby improving forecasting accuracy while maintaining extended lead times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing hydrological model parameters through calibration against observed data. The objective function modifies model parameters to better match historical observations, reducing uncertainty in weather-predicted rainfall and improving overall forecasting accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional methods focus on hydrological simulation rather than forecasting, then the rain-runoff relationship is modeled, but the forecasting ability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrological simulation accuracyVSAvoidforecasting ability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inversion by reversing the conventional approach: instead of using simulation to understand rain-runoff relationships and then attempting to forecast, the system directly optimizes the model for forecasting performance. The objective function is specifically designed to maximize forecasting accuracy by minimizing errors between predicted and observed streamflow, rather than merely simulating hydrological processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Device complexity

If conventional evaluation criteria focus on forecasted result at a single lead time, then the evaluation is simple, but it is unable to simultaneously describe the forecasted results at multiple lead times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation criteria complexityVSAvoidmulti lead time evaluation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies multi-functionality by designing an objective function that simultaneously evaluates forecasting performance across multiple lead times. The function aggregates errors from different forecast horizons into a single optimization target, allowing the model to be calibrated for multiple forecast periods concurrently rather than requiring separate evaluations for each lead time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10962682B2System and method for forecasting floods
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 WUHAN UNIV
  • US10962682B2 patent drawing
  • US10962682B2 patent drawing
  • US10962682B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for forecasting flood, the method including: calibrating the hydrological model by using an objective function that is a sum of squared difference between the observed streamflow and the corresponding forecasted streamflow at each lead time to obtain the optimized hydrological model; using the optimized hydrological model to forecast floods; and evaluating forecasting performance of the optimized hydrological model. The method improves the forecasting accuracy and provides forecasting results at various lead times.