Brushroll and floor cleaner

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users often forget to reinstall or incorrectly reinstall components like brushrolls and filters in floor cleaners, leading to poor cleaning performance and potential damage, especially when using low-quality replacements.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a detection mechanism with a permanent magnet and a Hall Effect sensor to ensure correct installation of brushrolls and filters, preventing operation of electrically-powered components if they are not properly installed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of repair

If components like brushrolls and filters are made removable for cleaning and replacement, then ease of maintenance is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to user error in reinstallation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of maintenanceVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a Hall Effect sensor that detects the presence and correct installation of replaceable components through a magnet. This feedback mechanism ensures that the cleaner only operates when components are properly installed, preventing user errors while maintaining ease of replacement. The sensor provides real-time information about component status to the control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical interlocking or snap-fit mechanisms with a magnetic field-based detection system. Instead of relying on physical engagement features that users might install incorrectly, the system uses a magnet and Hall Effect sensor to verify component installation, providing more reliable detection with simpler mechanical coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If a detection mechanism with magnet and Hall Effect sensor is added, then reliability is improved by ensuring correct component installation, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection functionality is extracted as a separate, dedicated subsystem consisting of a magnet embedded in the replaceable component and a Hall Effect sensor mounted on the cleaner body. This modular approach isolates the detection function from the main cleaning mechanism, making the system easier to understand and maintain despite the added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The Hall Effect sensor and magnet combination serves multiple functions: detecting component presence, verifying correct installation orientation, and preventing operation with unauthorized or incorrect components. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by consolidating several verification tasks into a single detection system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If operation is prevented when magnet is not detected, then reliability is improved by preventing damage from improper installation, but ease of operation deteriorates due to additional constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by preventing the cleaner from operating before any potential damage can occur. The Hall Effect sensor verifies correct component installation before allowing the motor and cleaning functions to activate, blocking erroneous operations in advance rather than reacting to failures after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-verification through the magnet-sensor interaction, automatically determining whether components are correctly installed without requiring user judgment or manual checks. The cleaner essentially checks itself before operation, reducing the cognitive load on the user while maintaining strict operational safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures proper functioning of the floor cleaner by ensuring that authorized and correctly installed components are used, enhancing cleaning performance and preventing damage from improper installation or low-quality replacements.

Implementation Method 1

a detection mechanism comprising a magnet on the replaceable component and a Hall Effect sensor positioned to detect the permanent magnet when the replaceable component is correctly installed on the floor cleaner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall Effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11206962B1Brushroll and floor cleaner
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 BISSELL INC
  • US11206962B1 patent drawing
  • US11206962B1 patent drawing
  • US11206962B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a floor cleaner that includes a replaceable component, such as a brushroll or a filter. The floor cleaner has a detection mechanism comprising a magnet on the replaceable component and a Hall Effect sensor positioned to detect the permanent magnet when the replaceable component is correctly installed on the floor cleaner. Operation of one or more electrically-powered components of the floor cleaner is prevented when the permanent magnet is not detected by the Hall Effect sensor.