Floor Cleaner Recovery Tank Float Indicator for Full Tank Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing floor cleaners lack an effective mechanism to indicate when the recovery tank is full, leading to inefficient liquid collection and potential overflow during cleaning operations.

Innovation Solution

A floor cleaner design featuring a recovery tank with a float and valve system that obstructs airflow when the tank is full, accompanied by a visible indicator to notify the user, ensuring proper liquid management and preventing overflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If no full tank indicator mechanism is provided, then the device structure remains simple, but the user cannot detect when the recovery tank is full leading to potential overflow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefull tank detection informationVSAvoidfloat and valve mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The float mechanism automatically detects the liquid level and actuates the valve to close the inlet when the tank is full, eliminating the need for external monitoring or control systems. The system serves itself by using the liquid's own buoyancy force to trigger the shutdown mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The float provides continuous feedback on the liquid level in the recovery tank. When the liquid reaches a certain level, the float rises and mechanically triggers the valve to close, creating a closed-loop feedback system that automatically responds to the tank's fill status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a float and valve system is added to automatically halt air intake when full, then overflow is prevented, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverflow prevention reliabilityVSAvoidfloat and valve system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The float mechanism automatically detects the liquid level and actuates the valve to close the inlet when the tank is full, eliminating the need for external monitoring or control systems. The system serves itself by using the liquid's own buoyancy force to trigger the shutdown mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the liquid itself as the actuating medium. The buoyancy force generated by the liquid on the float is converted into mechanical motion that closes the valve, utilizing hydraulic principles to achieve automatic control without external power sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Loss of information

If an indicator is added to show when the float is in closed position, then user awareness is enhanced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefull tank status informationVSAvoidindicator mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The indicator likely uses color changes or visual differentiation to indicate the float's position. When the float is in the closed position, the indicator changes appearance (such as changing color or becoming visible through a window), providing clear visual feedback to the user without requiring complex electronic displays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The indicator provides a visual copy or representation of the float's actual position. Instead of requiring the user to directly observe the float mechanism, the indicator creates a simplified visual signal that mirrors the float's state, making the information more accessible and easier to interpret.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for efficient liquid collection and prevents overflow by automatically halting air intake when the tank is full, enhancing user awareness through a visible indicator, thus optimizing cleaning operations.

Implementation Method 1

The float is moveable between a first position with the valve spaced away from the air outlet, allowing air to exit the chamber, and a second position with the valve adjacent the outlet, impeding the air form exiting the chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentEP4138624B1Floor cleaner with full tank indicator
Publication Date: 2024.10.16 TECHTRONIC FLOOR CARE TECH LTD
  • EP4138624B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4138624B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4138624B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A floor cleaner includes a recovery tank including an inflow path allowing liquid-laden air to enter the recovery tank, an outflow path allowing air to exit the recovery tank; and a chamber for storing liquid. The chamber includes an inlet, a separator that separates liquid from the liquid-laden air, an air outlet, and a float. The float includes a base and a valve with an indicator. The float is moveable between a first position and a second position. In the first position the valve is spaced away from the air outlet and air is allowed to exit the chamber. In the second position the valve is adjacent the outlet and impedes air from exiting the chamber. In the second position the indicator is visible when the chamber is full.