Floor Plan Feature Substitution for Low-Resource Surface Marking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surface marking robots face inefficiencies in resource management, particularly in printing time, material usage, and energy consumption when marking large surfaces, as they often lack effective methods to optimize these resources during the printing process.

Innovation Solution

The method involves modifying a digital representation of a floor plan to reduce printing resource consumption by identifying specific features and replacing them with alternative features that require less material, time, or energy, using a computer system integrated with the robot to process and execute these changes, allowing for optimized path planning and resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If surface marking robots mark large surfaces extensively, then coverage area is improved, but printing resource consumption (time, material, energy) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface coverage areaVSAvoidprinting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the surface area to be marked and pre-plans the marking path and pattern optimization before actual marking begins. This allows the robot to execute efficient marking patterns that minimize redundant movements and optimize resource usage across large surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The marking system dynamically adjusts marking parameters such as line density, pattern complexity, and robot speed based on real-time conditions and pre-calculated optimization algorithms. This enables the system to maintain high coverage area while adapting resource consumption to actual requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Area of stationary object

If surface marking robots mark large surfaces extensively, then coverage area is improved, but printing material usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface coverage areaVSAvoidprinting material usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes marking parameters such as line spacing, pattern type, and material deposition density based on surface area analysis. For large surfaces, the system optimizes these parameters to reduce material usage while maintaining adequate marking coverage, using algorithms that calculate minimum necessary material deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Before marking large surfaces, the system pre-calculates optimal material distribution patterns and identifies areas where material can be reduced without compromising marking effectiveness. This preliminary optimization significantly reduces overall material consumption across extensive surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Area of stationary object

If surface marking robots mark large surfaces extensively, then coverage area is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface coverage areaVSAvoidrobot energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The robot system dynamically adjusts its operating parameters including speed, acceleration, and marking intensity based on the scale of the surface being marked. For large surfaces, the system optimizes movement patterns and marking cycles to reduce energy consumption per unit area while maintaining overall coverage efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary energy analysis and path optimization before marking large surfaces, calculating the most energy-efficient routes and marking sequences. This pre-planning allows the robot to minimize unnecessary movements and optimize energy usage across extensive coverage areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If detailed floor plan features are marked, then marking precision is improved, but printing resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking precisionVSAvoidprinting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different marking qualities and densities to different regions of the floor plan based on their importance and functional requirements. Critical areas receive higher precision marking with more detailed features, while less critical areas use optimized patterns that reduce time consumption. This local differentiation maintains necessary precision while reducing overall marking time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes marking parameters such as line thickness, pattern complexity, and robot speed based on the specific features being marked. For detailed floor plan features requiring high precision, the system adjusts parameters to achieve accuracy while minimizing the time spent on each feature through optimized path planning and parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240231326A1Surface marking robots and floor plans
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US20240231326A1 patent drawing
  • US20240231326A1 patent drawing
  • US20240231326A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example, a method of operating a surface marking robot comprises receiving a first digital representation of a floor plan comprising a plurality of floor plan features, and identifying a specific floor plan feature corresponding to a specific printing resources consumption. In response to identifying the specific floor plan feature, the method comprises modifying the first digital representation to produce a second digital representation in which the specific floor plan feature is replaced by an alternative floor plan feature corresponding to an alternative printing resources consumption which is reduced compared to the specific printing resources consumption.