Froth Flotation Bubble Characterization via Contact Angle Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current froth flotation processes face limitations in efficiently recovering larger particles due to non-uniform nano/micro-bubble size distribution and lack of real-time characterization of contact angles, which affects the attachment and flotation efficiency of particles.

Innovation Solution

A computer-driven system that processes images of bubbles and particles to determine contact angles and predict process improvements by optimizing bubble size distribution and contact angle, enabling more efficient particle recovery through automated characterization and visualization of nano/micro-bubbles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional bubble generation methods are used, then bubbles are produced, but the bubble size distribution is non-uniform which reduces particle recovery efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle recovery efficiencyVSAvoidbubble size uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs porous materials with controlled pore sizes to generate bubbles. The porous structure ensures uniform bubble nucleation and size distribution, directly resolving the contradiction between productivity and manufacturing precision by providing consistent bubble dimensions that enhance particle recovery efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies physical parameters such as gas flow rate, pressure, and porous material characteristics to optimize bubble generation. By controlling these parameters, the system achieves uniform bubble size distribution while maintaining high productivity, thereby improving particle recovery efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If real-time contact angle measurement is implemented, then bubble-particle attachment can be optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflotation efficiencyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time contact angle measurement with feedback control to optimize bubble-particle attachment. The system continuously monitors contact angles and adjusts operational parameters accordingly, resolving the contradiction by using automated feedback loops that maintain high flotation efficiency without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with optical or computational methods for contact angle determination. This substitution reduces device complexity while maintaining the ability to optimize bubble-particle attachment in real-time, thereby preserving flotation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If larger particles are targeted for flotation, then recovery of valuable materials increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial recovery rateVSAvoidflotation process energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes operational parameters such as bubble size, gas flow rate, and reagent dosage to efficiently float larger particles. By carefully controlling these parameters, the system achieves high material recovery rates while minimizing energy consumption through optimized process conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies localized optimizations in different regions of the flotation cell, such as varying bubble injection rates or reagent dosing in specific zones. This approach enhances the recovery of larger particles in critical areas while reducing overall energy consumption by avoiding uniform high-energy input throughout the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances particle recovery efficiency by allowing for real-time optimization of bubble-particle attachment, reducing energy consumption and costs, and enabling the flotation of larger particles, thereby improving the overall froth flotation process.

Implementation Method 1

recovering or recycling particles out of a solution by bubbling the solution so as to float the particles to the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

hydrophobic particles come in contact with and adhere to bubbles, rising with them to the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic interaction: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 3

characterizing and visualizing nano and/or micro bubbles as may be used in a particle recovery process which floats particles that attach to such bubbles out of a liquid, where this characterizing and visualizing is computer-driven and includes image processing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage processing: Image Processing

Data Source

PatentUS9652841B2System and method for characterizing NANO/MICRO bubbles for particle recovery
Publication Date: 2017.05.16 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9652841B2 patent drawing
  • US9652841B2 patent drawing
  • US9652841B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for a froth flotation system receives inputs from one or more sensors comprising images of a fluid having bubbles and particles therein; some of the bubbles are attached to some of the particles and suspended in the fluid. For at least some of the bubbles with attached particles, it is determined from the inputs at least two contact angles at different locations at which the respective bubble is attached to the particle. These contact angles are used to predict a process improvement by which bubbles would more efficiently float the particles out of the fluid, as compared to that represented by the input images. An output is then provided for driving a graphical display screen, the output comprising at least one of: a) a graphical representation of the determined at least two contact angles; and b) a graphical representation of the predicted process improvement.