Emergency Flotation Device Double-Chamber Gas Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing emergency flotation devices face inefficiencies and safety concerns due to dual-function compartments that hinder full reactant utilization and increase the risk of leaks, particularly with the use of hazardous chemicals like sodium azide, leading to inconsistent gas production and potential failures in life-saving situations.

Innovation Solution

A novel double-chamber structure where a separate chemical reaction chamber ensures full or nearly full completion of the reaction, with a gas-tight inflatable compartment designed to collect the produced gas, minimizing reactant dispersion and containing potentially hazardous reactants within the reaction chamber, and using a pressure-sensitive one-way passageway to control gas flow, ensuring consistent and safe gas production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a dual-function compartment is used to store reactants and become inflated, then the device structure is simplified, but the chemical reaction cannot be fully completed and gas production becomes inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidgas production consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into two separate functional compartments: a reaction chamber for storing reactants and an inflatable bladder for gas collection. This segmentation allows the chemical reaction to complete fully in the reaction chamber while the bladder remains dedicated to gas storage, ensuring consistent and reliable gas production without the interference of dual-function design limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If reactants are stored in the inflatable bladder, then the device structure is simplified, but the risk of hazardous chemical exposure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidchemical exposure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction chamber and inflatable bladder are separated into distinct compartments. The reaction chamber contains the hazardous reactants (such as sodium azide) and is designed to withstand chemical reactions, while the inflatable bladder is dedicated to gas storage and does not contact chemicals, thereby eliminating the risk of chemical exposure while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A one-way valve acts as an intermediary between the reaction chamber and inflatable bladder. This valve allows gas to pass from the reaction chamber to the bladder but prevents any backflow of chemicals or reaction byproducts into the bladder, providing a safety barrier that protects against hazardous chemical exposure while maintaining the simplified dual-chamber structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If reactants are positioned at opposite sides of a compartment, then the device structure is simplified, but the reactants cannot be in close contact for complete reaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidreaction completion rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of placing reactants at opposite sides of a single compartment, the invention uses a dedicated reaction chamber where reactants can be positioned in close proximity or mixed together. This ensures complete contact between reactants for full reaction completion, while the separate inflatable bladder collects the produced gas without interfering with the reaction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the reliability and safety of emergency flotation devices by maximizing gas yield from a smaller volume of reactants, providing consistent gas production and reducing the risk of hazardous chemical exposure, thus improving the chances of effective deployment in emergency situations.

Implementation Method 1

a reaction chamber (10) configured to generate inflation gas through chemical reactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reactions: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

a pressure-sensitive one-way passageway (16) through which the inflation gas can emerge from the reaction chamber (10) to the inflatable compartment (11)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11623717B2Emergency flotation device with chemical reaction chamber
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 SEA ARK TECH LTD
  • US11623717B2 patent drawing
  • US11623717B2 patent drawing
  • US11623717B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inflatable flotation device having a reaction chamber with reactants that generate gas when mixed, said reactants being separated by a barrier assembly; an activating mechanism adapted to remove or puncture the barrier assembly such that said reactants mix; and an inflatable compartment fluidly connected to the reaction chamber by means of a pressure sensitive passageway, adapted to open only when the pressure of the gas in said reaction chamber exceeds a predetermined threshold. This ensures that most of the reactants are used up to generate gas before the gas enters the inflatable chamber, thus preventing scattering of the reactants. Some implementations have a reaction chamber without a barrier assembly, comprising reactants that generate gas when mixed with water and an activating mechanism adapted to expose the reactants to water. A variety of manual or automatic mechanisms may be employed to activate the reaction and inflate the device.